Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28161793›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2017

Frankfurt microsurgery course: the first 175 trainees.

G Perez-Abadia, M Janko, L Pindur, M Sauerbier, J H Barker, I Joshua, I Marzi, J Frank

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Intensive hands-on microsurgery course provides a solid foundation for performing clinical microvascular surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

G Perez-AbadiaDepartment of Physiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
M JankoDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/main, Germany.
L PindurFrankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/main, Germany.
M SauerbierDepartment of Plastic, Hand & Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center, Frankfurt/main, Germany.
J H BarkerFrankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/main, Germany. JHB121654@gmail.com.
I JoshuaDepartment of Physiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
I MarziDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/main, Germany.
J FrankDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, JW Goethe-University, Frankfurt/main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Louisville · USCardiovascular Center Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMicrosurgery courses, taught external to surgical training programs, are essential for acquiring the high level of technical skill required for clinical proficiency.

methodsThe Frankfurt microsurgery course is a 5-day, intensive course that teaches arterial and venous anastomosis using end-to-end, end-to-side, one-way-up, continuous-suture, and vessel graft techniques. During the course, the instructor records the level of skill (in-course data) achieved by each trainee by assessing anastomosis completion and patency. Demographic information is also collected. Post-course trainees are invited to complete an online survey (post-course data) to get their opinions of the courses' effectiveness.

resultsThe in-course "skill achievement" and post-course "course effectiveness" data are presented below. In-course data: 94.8 and 59.9% of participants completed patent end-to-end arterial and venous anastomoses, respectively, while 85.4% performed a patent end-to-side anastomosis. 96.1 and 57.1% of participants who attempted arterial and venous anastomoses using the one-way-up technique were successful, as were 90.9% of those attempting continuous-suture technique. Patent venous grafts were performed by 54.7% of participants. POST-COURSE DATA: All respondents indicated significant improvement of their microsurgical skills after taking the course. 66.7% of respondents considered the full-time presence of the instructor to be the most valuable aspect of the course. All respondents would highly recommend the course to colleagues.

conclusionThe microcourse significantly increased trainees' clinical microsurgery skills, confidence, and the number of clinical cases they perform. Of all the anastomosis techniques taught, venous anastomosis and grafting were the most difficult to learn. The presence of a full-time experienced instructor was most important.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalCurriculumFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationSuture TechniquesVascular Surgical ProceduresEducationEvaluation in microsurgeryFrankfurt microsurgery courseMicrosurgerySkillsTraining

Identifiers

PMID28161793
PMCPMC5487763
OpenAlexW2585620006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.