ArticleChild abuse & neglect2017
Research priorities for a multi-center child abuse pediatrics network - CAPNET.
Article in Child abuse & neglect, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research themes and key data points for child and adolescent emergency department mental health presentations: A national Delphi study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- An exploratory study of addressing bias for child abuse teams: the role of narrative medicine.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Development, contributions, and future directions of a multicenter child abuse research network.Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care · 2024Article
- The CAPNET multi-center data set for child physical abuse: Rationale, methods and scope.Child abuse & neglect · 2022Article
- A child abuse research network: Now what?Child abuse & neglect · 2017Article
- A Novel Scale to Communicate Perceived Likelihood of Child Sexual Abuse.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although child maltreatment medical research has benefited from several multi-center studies, the new specialty of child abuse pediatrics has not had a sustainable network capable of pursuing multiple, prospective, clinically-oriented studies. The Child Abuse Pediatrics Network (CAPNET) is a new multi-center research network dedicated to child maltreatment medical research. In order to establish a relevant, practical research agenda, we conducted a modified Delphi process to determine the topic areas with highest priority for such a network. Research questions were solicited from members of the Ray E. Helfer Society and study authors and were sorted into topic areas. These topic areas were rated for priority using iterative rounds of ratings and in-person meetings. The topics rated with the highest priority were missed diagnosis and selected/indicated prevention. This agenda can be used to target future multi-center child maltreatment medical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.