Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28161584›Full record

ReviewHearing research2017

Analytical and numerical modeling of the hearing system: Advances towards the assessment of hearing damage.

Annalisa De Paolis, Marom Bikson, Jeremy T Nelson, J Alexander de Ru, Mark Packer, Luis Cardoso

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Coupled Finite Element Model of the Middle and Inner Ear as Virtual Test Environment for Stapes Surgery.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Study on Attenuation Characteristics of Reissner's Membrane Mode in Cochlea.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annalisa De PaolisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Grove School of Engineering of the City College and, The Graduate School of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10031, United States.
Marom BiksonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Grove School of Engineering of the City College and, The Graduate School of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10031, United States.
Jeremy T NelsonDoD Hearing Center of Excellence, 59MDW/SG02O, 2200 Bergquist Drive, Suite 1, Lackland, AFB, TX 78236, United States.
J Alexander de RuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Central Military Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Mark PackerDoD Hearing Center of Excellence, 59MDW/SG02O, 2200 Bergquist Drive, Suite 1, Lackland, AFB, TX 78236, United States.
Luis CardosoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Grove School of Engineering of the City College and, The Graduate School of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10031, United States. Electronic address: cardoso@ccny.cuny.edu.

Funding

Mechanical Function of Trabecular Bone: Bone Loss Assessment Beyond BMDSC1DK103362 · NIDDK · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI CARDOSO, LUIS · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS SC1 DK103362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing is an extremely complex phenomenon, involving a large number of interrelated variables that are difficult to measure in vivo. In order to investigate such process under simplified and well-controlled conditions, models of sound transmission have been developed through many decades of research. The value of modeling the hearing system is not only to explain the normal function of the hearing system and account for experimental and clinical observations, but to simulate a variety of pathological conditions that lead to hearing damage and hearing loss, as well as for development of auditory implants, effective ear protections and auditory hazard countermeasures. In this paper, we provide a review of the strategies used to model the auditory function of the external, middle, inner ear, and the micromechanics of the organ of Corti, along with some of the key results obtained from such modeling efforts. Recent analytical and numerical approaches have incorporated the nonlinear behavior of some parameters and structures into their models. Few models of the integrated hearing system exist; in particular, we describe the evolution of the Auditory Hazard Assessment Algorithm for Human (AHAAH) model, used for prediction of hearing damage due to high intensity sound pressure. Unlike the AHAAH model, 3D finite element models of the entire hearing system are not able yet to predict auditory risk and threshold shifts. It is expected that both AHAAH and FE models will evolve towards a more accurate assessment of threshold shifts and hearing loss under a variety of stimuli conditions and pathologies.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHearingModels, TheoreticalNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsAuditory FatigueAuditory PerceptionEarFinite Element AnalysisHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansNoiseNonlinear DynamicsPressureAHAAH modelAuditory system modelingCochlea micromechanics modelingFinite element modelHearing damage modeling

Identifiers

PMID28161584
PMCPMC7000179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.