Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28161582›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids2017

Opinion article on lipidomics: Inherent challenges of lipidomic analysis of sphingolipids.

Alfred H Merrill, M Cameron Sullards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Glycosphingolipids and Infection. Potential New Therapeutic Avenues.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alfred H MerrillSchool of Biological Sciences, Chemistry and Biochemistry, and the Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0230 USA. Electronic address: al.merrill@biology.gatech.edu.
M Cameron SullardsSchool of Biological Sciences, Chemistry and Biochemistry, and the Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0230 USA. Electronic address: cameron.sullards@chemistry.gatech.edu.

Funding

STEROL LIPIDSU54GM069338 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DENNIS, EDWARD A · 2003 to 2013
$72.2M
Characterization of Mammalian Ceramide SynthasesR01GM076217 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MERRILL, ALFRED HARRISON · 2007 to 2015
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076217NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM069338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A challenge for sphingolipidomic analysis is the vast number of subspecies, including a large number of isomers-a complication that was even appreciated by the original discoverer of sphingolipids J. L. W. Thudichum (The Chemistry of the Brain, p. x, 1884): "In the course of my researches many unforeseen complications arose, prominent amongst which were those caused by the occurrence of chemical principles having the same atomic or elementary composition, but differing in other chemical, or in physical properties, varieties producing the phenomenon which in chemistry is termed isomerism." Therefore, it is essential to choose the appropriate method(s) for the goal of the analysis, to know the assumptions and limitations of method(s) used, and to temper interpretation of the data accordingly. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: BBALIP_Lipidomics Opinion Articles edited by Sepp Kohlwein.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansIsomerismLipid MetabolismMetabolomicsSphingolipidsSphingolipids

Identifiers

PMID28161582
PMCPMC5476497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.