Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28161570›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2017

Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study.

Mohammad Ali, Allyson Nelson, Francisco J Luquero, Andrew S Azman, Amanda K Debes, Maurice Mwesawina M'bang'ombe, Linly Seyama, Evans Kachale, Kingsley Zuze, Desire Malichi and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02499172 (Follow-up of Pregnant Women After a Mass Vaccination of Oral Cholera Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02499172 naterminatednot on this map

Follow-up of Pregnant Women After a Mass Vaccination of Oral Cholera Vaccine

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2015 to 2016Enrolled2,758ConditionsMiscarriage, Stillbirth, CholeraArmsShanchol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Cholera Infection Risks and Cholera Vaccine Safety in Pregnancy.Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2023
    Review
  4. Maternal vaccination: a review of current evidence and recommendations.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Oral cholera vaccine in cholera prevention and control, Malawi.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cholera vaccination: pregnant women excluded no more.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad AliJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: mali25@jhu.edu.
Allyson NelsonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Francisco J LuqueroJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrew S AzmanJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amanda K DebesJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Maurice Mwesawina M'bang'ombeEpidemiological Unit, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Linly SeyamaJohns Hopkins Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Evans KachaleJohns Hopkins Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Kingsley ZuzeJohns Hopkins Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Desire MalichiJohns Hopkins Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Fatima ZuluJohns Hopkins Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Kelias Phiri MsyambozaWorld Health Organization, Malawi Country Office, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Storn KabuluziPreventive Health Services Department, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
David A SackJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USBlantyre Institute for Community Ophthalmology · MWMinistry of Health · MWWorld Health Organization - Malawi · MW

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often excluded pregnant women because of insufficient safety data for use during pregnancy. We did an observational cohort study to assess the safety of Shanchol during pregnancy.

methodsThis observational cohort study was done in two adjacent districts (Nsanje and Chikwawa) in Malawi. Individuals older than 1 year in Nsanje were offered oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign between March 30 and April 30, 2015, but no vaccines were administered in Chikwawa. We enrolled women who were exposed to oral cholera vaccine during pregnancy in Nsanje district, and women who were pregnant in Chikwawa district (and thus not exposed to oral cholera vaccine) during the same period. The primary endpoint of our analysis was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were neonatal deaths and malformations. We evaluated these endpoints using log-binomial regression, adjusting for the imbalanced baseline characteristics between the groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02499172.

findingsWe recruited 900 women exposed to oral cholera vaccine and 899 women not exposed to the vaccine between June 16 and Oct 10, 2015, and analysed 835 in each group. 361 women exposed to the vaccine and 327 not exposed to the vaccine were recruited after their pregnancies had ended. The incidence of pregnancy loss was 27·54 (95% CI 18·41-41·23) per 1000 pregnancies among those exposed to the vaccine and 21·56 (13·65-34·04) per 1000 among those not exposed. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss among those exposed to oral cholera vaccine was 1·24 (95% CI 0·64-2·43; p=0·52) compared with those not exposed to the vaccine. The neonatal mortality rate was 11·78 (95% CI 5·92-23·46) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were exposed to oral cholera vaccine versus 8·91 (4·02-19·77) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were not exposed to the vaccine (crude relative risk 1·32, 95% CI 0·46-3·84; p=0·60). Only three newborn babies had malformations, two in the vaccine exposure group and one in the no-exposure group, yielding a relative risk of 2·00 (95% CI 0·18-22·04; p=0·57), although this estimate is unreliable because of the small number of outcomes.

interpretationOur study provides evidence that fetal exposure to oral cholera vaccine confers no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss, neonatal mortality, or malformation. These data, along with findings from two retrospective studies, support use of oral cholera vaccine in pregnant women in cholera-affected regions.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Cholera VaccinesSafetyAdministration, OralAdultCholeraFemaleFetal DeathHumansIncidenceMalawiMothersPregnancyRetrospective StudiesVaccines, InactivatedCholera VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID28161570
PMCPMC5406486
OpenAlexW2583593685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.