Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28161563›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2017

Single-Center Experience with a Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Assay for Assessment of Relevant Somatic Alterations in Solid Tumors.

Aino Paasinen-Sohns, Viktor H Koelzer, Angela Frank, Julian Schafroth, Aline Gisler, Melanie Sachs, Anne Graber, Sacha I Rothschild, Andreas Wicki, Gieri Cathomas and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Overview of precision oncology trials: challenges and opportunities.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aino Paasinen-SohnsCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Viktor H KoelzerCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; Translational Research Unit (TRU), Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Angela FrankCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Julian SchafrothCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Aline GislerCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Melanie SachsCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Anne GraberCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Sacha I RothschildUniversity Hospital Basel, Division of Medical Oncology, Petersgraben 4, CH, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas WickiUniversity Hospital Basel, Division of Medical Oncology, Petersgraben 4, CH, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Gieri CathomasCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Kirsten D MertzCantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology, Mühlemattstrasse 11, CH, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland. Electronic address: kirsten.mertz@ksbl.ch.
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Companion diagnostics rely on genomic testing of molecular alterations to enable effective cancer treatment. Here we report the clinical application and validation of the Oncomine Focus Assay (OFA), an integrated, commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for the rapid and simultaneous detection of single nucleotide variants, short insertions and deletions, copy number variations, and gene rearrangements in 52 cancer genes with therapeutic relevance. Two independent patient cohorts were investigated to define the workflow, turnaround times, feasibility, and reliability of OFA targeted sequencing in clinical application and using archival material. Cohort I consisted of 59 diagnostic clinical samples from the daily routine submitted for molecular testing over a 4-month time period. Cohort II consisted of 39 archival melanoma samples that were up to 15years old. Libraries were prepared from isolated nucleic acids and sequenced on the Ion Torrent PGM sequencer. Sequencing datasets were analyzed using the Ion Reporter software. Genomic alterations were identified and validated by orthogonal conventional assays including pyrosequencing and immunohistochemistry. Sequencing results of both cohorts, including archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material stored up to 15years, were consistent with published variant frequencies. A concordance of 100% between established assays and OFA targeted NGS was observed. The OFA workflow enabled a turnaround of 3½ days. Taken together, OFA was found to be a convenient tool for fast, reliable, broadly applicable and cost-effective targeted NGS of tumor samples in routine diagnostics. Thus, OFA has strong potential to become an important asset for precision oncology.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasmsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28161563
PMCPMC5293722
OpenAlexW2583313004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.