ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2017
Single-Center Experience with a Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Assay for Assessment of Relevant Somatic Alterations in Solid Tumors.
Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world application of targeted next-generation sequencing for identifying molecular variants in Asian non-small-cell lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Early and Advanced Gastric Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Genetic profile of thymic epithelial tumors in the Japanese population: an exploratory study examining potential therapeutic targets.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
- The Diagnostic Utility of Cell-Free DNA from Ex Vivo Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Genetic profiling of somatic alterations by Oncomine Focus Assay in Korean patients with advanced gastric cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Methods for Identifying Patients with Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase (TRK) Fusion Cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020Review
- Resistance to targeted therapies as a multifactorial, gradual adaptation to inhibitor specific selective pressures.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Therapeutic management of neuro-oncologic patients - potential relevance of CSF liquid biopsy.Theranostics · 2020Article
- Article
- Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Article
- Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study.Translational oncology · 2019Article
- Overview of precision oncology trials: challenges and opportunities.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2018Review
- Article
- Targeted next-generation-sequencing for reliable detection of targetable rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma-a single center retrospective study.Pathology, research and practice · 2018Article
- Multicenter validation of cancer gene panel-based next-generation sequencing for translational research and molecular diagnostics.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Companion diagnostics rely on genomic testing of molecular alterations to enable effective cancer treatment. Here we report the clinical application and validation of the Oncomine Focus Assay (OFA), an integrated, commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for the rapid and simultaneous detection of single nucleotide variants, short insertions and deletions, copy number variations, and gene rearrangements in 52 cancer genes with therapeutic relevance. Two independent patient cohorts were investigated to define the workflow, turnaround times, feasibility, and reliability of OFA targeted sequencing in clinical application and using archival material. Cohort I consisted of 59 diagnostic clinical samples from the daily routine submitted for molecular testing over a 4-month time period. Cohort II consisted of 39 archival melanoma samples that were up to 15years old. Libraries were prepared from isolated nucleic acids and sequenced on the Ion Torrent PGM sequencer. Sequencing datasets were analyzed using the Ion Reporter software. Genomic alterations were identified and validated by orthogonal conventional assays including pyrosequencing and immunohistochemistry. Sequencing results of both cohorts, including archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material stored up to 15years, were consistent with published variant frequencies. A concordance of 100% between established assays and OFA targeted NGS was observed. The OFA workflow enabled a turnaround of 3½ days. Taken together, OFA was found to be a convenient tool for fast, reliable, broadly applicable and cost-effective targeted NGS of tumor samples in routine diagnostics. Thus, OFA has strong potential to become an important asset for precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.