Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28161317›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2017

Characterization of Cancer Patients in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Jacqueline M Mix, Carl V Granger, Michael J LaMonte, Paulette Niewczyk, Margaret A DiVita, Richard Goldstein, Jerome W Yates, Jo L Freudenheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frequency and reasons for unplanned transfer to the primary acute care service of inpatient rehabilitation glioblastoma multiforme patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fatigue and functional outcomes in cancer rehabilitation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Changing Paradigms in the Rehabilitation of Inpatients with Brain Tumors.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2018
    Article
  17. A Guide to Inpatient Cancer Rehabilitation: Focusing on Patient Selection and Evidence-Based Outcomes.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacqueline M MixNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: jacqueline.mix@emory.edu.
Carl V GrangerUniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, Amherst, NY.
Michael J LaMonteDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Paulette NiewczykUniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, Amherst, NY; Daemen College, Health Care Studies Department, Amherst, NY.
Margaret A DiVitaHealth Department, State University of New York at Cortland, Cortland, NY.
Richard GoldsteinDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Jerome W YatesDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Jo L FreudenheimDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Epidemiology at UBR25CA113951 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI FREUDENHEIM, JO L., MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B. · 2007 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NCI NIH HHS R25 CA113951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the types of cancer patients admitted to inpatient medical rehabilitation and to describe their rehabilitation outcomes.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingU.S. inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs).

participantsAdult patients (N=27,952) with a malignant cancer diagnosis admitted to an IRF with a cancer-related impairment between October 2010 and September 2012 were identified from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measuresDemographic, medical, and rehabilitation characteristics for patients with various cancer tumor types were summarized using data collected from the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument. Rehabilitation outcomes included the percentage of patients discharged to the community and acute care settings, and functional change from admission to discharge. Functional status was measured using the FIM instrument.

resultsCancer patients constituted about 2.4% of the total IRF patient population. Cancer types included brain and nervous system (52.9%), digestive (12.0%), bone and joint (8.7%), blood and lymphatic (7.6%), respiratory (7.1%), and other (11.7%). Overall, 72% were discharged to a community setting, and 16.5% were discharged back to acute care. Patients with blood and lymphatic cancers had the highest frequency of discharge back to acute care (28%). On average, all cancer patient groups made significant functional gains during their IRF stay (mean FIM total change ± SD, 23.5±16.2).

conclusionsIn a database representing approximately 70% of all U.S. patients in IRFs, we found that patients with a variety of cancer types are admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. Most cancer patients admitted to IRFs were discharged to a community setting and, on average, improved their function. Future research is warranted to understand the referral patterns of admission to postacute care rehabilitation and to identify factors that are associated with rehabilitation benefit in order to inform the establishment of appropriate care protocols.

Indexed as

Age FactorsFemaleHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleNeoplasmsPatient DischargeRecovery of FunctionRehabilitation CentersRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSocioeconomic FactorsHospitalizationNeoplasmsRehabilitationSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID28161317
PMCPMC6034510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.