ArticleJournal of safety research2017
Evaluation of an in-vehicle monitoring system (IVMS) to reduce risky driving behaviors in commercial drivers: Comparison of in-cab warning lights and supervisory coaching with videos of driving behavior.
Article in Journal of safety research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Information, assessment, or decision: a driving simulator study on the effect of real-time feedback based on information-processing stages.Ergonomics · 2025Article
- Fatal work-related motor vehicle crashes in the United States, 2011-2014: Analysis of matched data from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System.Journal of safety research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Driver Monitoring and Analyzing Safety Critical Events in Vehicles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Risky driving behaviors and employer motor vehicle safety policies among U.S. oil and gas extraction workers.Journal of safety research · 2023Article
- Assessing the Australian occupational driver behavior questionnaire in U.S. taxi drivers: Different country, different occupation and different worker population.Journal of safety research · 2022Article
- In-Cabin Monitoring System for Autonomous Vehicles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Privacy-Preserved In-Cabin Monitoring System for Autonomous Vehicles.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Workers' compensation claim counts and rates by injury event/exposure among state-insured private employers in Ohio, 2007-2017.Journal of safety research · 2021Article
- Factors associated with different levels of daytime sleepiness among Korean construction drivers: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Video feedback intervention for cognitively impaired older drivers: A randomized clinical trial.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2021Article
- Analytical observational study of nonfatal motor vehicle collisions and incidents in a light-vehicle sales and service fleet.Accident; analysis and prevention · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
problemRoadway incidents are the leading cause of work-related death in the United States.
methodsThe objective of this research was to evaluate whether two types of feedback from a commercially available in-vehicle monitoring system (IVMS) would reduce the incidence of risky driving behaviors in drivers from two companies. IVMS were installed in 315 vehicles representing the industries of local truck transportation and oil and gas support operations, and data were collected over an approximate two-year period in intervention and control groups. In one period, intervention group drivers were given feedback from in-cab warning lights from an IVMS that indicated occurrence of harsh vehicle maneuvers. In another period, intervention group drivers viewed video recordings of their risky driving behaviors with supervisors, and were coached by supervisors on safe driving practices.
resultsRisky driving behaviors declined significantly more during the period with coaching plus instant feedback with lights in comparison to the period with lights-only feedback (ORadj=0.61 95% CI 0.43-0.86; Holm-adjusted p=0.035) and the control group (ORadj=0.52 95% CI 0.33-0.82; Holm-adjusted p=0.032). Lights-only feedback was not found to be significantly different than the control group's decline from baseline (ORadj=0.86 95% CI 0.51-1.43; Holm-adjusted p>0.05).
conclusionsThe largest decline in the rate of risky driving behaviors occurred when feedback included both supervisory coaching and lights. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Supervisory coaching is an effective form of feedback to improve driving habits in the workplace. The potential advantages and limitations of this IVMS-based intervention program are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.