Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28160351›Full record

ArticleBipolar disorders2017

Comparison of treatment outcome using two definitions of rapid cycling in subjects with bipolar II disorder.

Jay D Amsterdam, Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces, Robert J DeRubeis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bipolar disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jay D AmsterdamDepression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lorenzo Lorenzo-LuacesDepression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8882-0243
Robert J DeRubeisDepression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Treatment of Bipolar Type II Major DepressionR01MH060353 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DERUBEIS, ROBERT J · 2001 to 2011
$3.9M
1/2-Prevention of Relapse & Recurrence of Bipolar DepressionR01MH080097 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DERUBEIS, ROBERT J · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060353NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined differences in treatment outcome between Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)-defined rapid cycling and average lifetime-defined rapid cycling in subjects with bipolar II disorder. We hypothesized that, compared with the DSM-IV definition, the average lifetime definition of rapid cycling may better identify subjects with a history of more mood lability and a greater likelihood of hypomanic symptom induction during long-term treatment.

methodsSubjects ≥18 years old with a bipolar II major depressive episode (n=129) were categorized into DSM-IV- and average lifetime-defined rapid cycling and prospectively treated with either venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy for 12 weeks. Responders (n=59) received continuation monotherapy for six additional months.

resultsThese exploratory analyses found moderate agreement between the two rapid-cycling definitions (κ=0.56). The lifetime definition captured subjects with more chronic courses of bipolar II depression, whereas the DSM-IV definition captured subjects with more acute symptoms of hypomania. There was no difference between rapid-cycling definitions with respect to the response to acute venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy. However, the lifetime definition was slightly superior to the DSM-IV definition in identifying subjects who went on to experience hypomanic symptoms during continuation therapy.

conclusionsAlthough sample sizes were limited, the findings suggest that the lifetime definition of rapid cycling may identify individuals with a chronic rapid-cycling course and may also be slightly superior to the DSM-IV definition in identifying individuals with hypomania during relapse-prevention therapy. These findings are preliminary in nature and need replication in larger, prospective, bipolar II studies.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderAdultAffectAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic AgentsDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeriodicityProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSecondary PreventionTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic Agentsantidepressantbipolar disorderdepressionlithiummaniamood stabilizerrapid cyclingvenlafaxine

Identifiers

PMID28160351
PMCPMC5367974
OpenAlexW2583557845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.