ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018
Comparison between the summed difference score and myocardial blood flow measured by
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04941248 (The Application of Total-body 13N-NH3 PET/CT to Study the Blood Perfusion System in Severe AS Patients Before and After TAVR Surgery in the Whole Body), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Application of Total-body 13N-NH3 PET/CT to Study the Blood Perfusion System in Severe AS Patients Before and After TAVR Surgery in the Whole Body
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Total-body dynamic PET/CT imaging reveals kinetic distribution of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Deep learning approach using SPECT-to-PET translation for attenuation correction in CT-less myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Detection efficacy of analog [European radiology · 2023Article
- Comparison of left ventricle mechanical dyssynchrony parameters in ischemic and non-ischemic patients usingJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Comparative analysis between myocardial perfusion reserve and maximal ischemia score at single photon emission computed tomography with new-generation cadmium-zinc-telluride cameras.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Observational
- Sub-endocardial and sub-epicardial measurement of myocardial blood flow usingJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Observational
- Review
- Comparison of two software systems for quantification of myocardial blood flow in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Review
- Radiopharmaceutical tracers for cardiac imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth the myocardial perfusion pattern and myocardial blood flow (MBF) are used to assess patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to compare the perfusion pattern (using the summed difference score [SDS]) to MBF in a consecutive group of patients undergoing PET/CT with 13 N-ammonia (
methods47 consecutive patients, aged 65 ± 12 years (42 men) with known or suspected CAD, underwent vasodilator stress/rest PET/CT with
resultsThere were no significant differences between patients with no ischemia (SDS ≤ 1) and those with ischemia (SDS > 1) in CFR (2.84 ± 0.73 vs 2.63 ± 0.89, P = NS) and DMBF (1.34 ± 0.45 vs 1.24 ± 0.53 mL·minute
Indexed as
Identifiers
28160262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.