Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28160010›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2017

The effect of sacral neuromodulation on pregnancy: a systematic review.

Amr Mahran, Alex Soriano, Ahmed S Safwat, Adonis Hijaz, Sangeeta T Mahajan, Emanuel C Trabuco, Steven W Siegel, Sherif A El-Nashar

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Neurostimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain during Pregnancy: Implications for Child and Mother Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Sacral Neuromodulation in Pregnant Women-A Case Report and Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Neuromodulation - a therapeutic option for refractory overactive bladder. A recent literature review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Amr MahranDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Alex SorianoDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Ahmed S SafwatDepartment of Urology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Adonis HijazDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Sangeeta T MahajanDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Emanuel C TrabucoDivision of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Steven W SiegelMetro Urology Centers for Continence Care and Female Urology, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Sherif A El-NasharDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. sherif.el-nashar@uhhospitals.org.
Assiut University · EGUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity School · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMetro Urology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisTo evaluate the effects of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) on pregnancy and the impact of delivery on SNM function.

methodsA systematic search was conducted through January 2016. We selected studies including women who had SNM and a subsequent pregnancy.

resultsOut of 2,316, eight studies were included, comprising 22 patients (26 pregnancies). SNM indications were Fowler's syndrome in 11, urinary retention in 6, fecal incontinence in 1, fecal and urinary urgency in 1, overactive bladder in 1, intractable interstitial cystitis in 1, and myelodysplasia in 1. SNM stayed on in 8 pregnancies. In the remaining 18 pregnancies in which the device was deactivated, 7 had recurrent urinary tract infections, including 1 with pyelonephritis and 2 who requested reactivation owing to recurrent symptoms. Outcomes were reported in 25 pregnancies, 16 had Cesarean section (CS) and 9 had vaginal delivery, including 2 operative deliveries. Out of 25, two infants had pilonidal sinus and motor tic disorder (exhibited at the age of 2 years), both from the same mother. After delivery, SNM was functioning in 15 (60%), 4 required reprogramming, and 3 required replacement (1 had recurrence of fecal incontinence after her operative delivery with evidence of displaced leads and 1 patient reported decreased SNM effects after her two CS), and 3 decided to remove the device (2 out of 3 patients were free of symptoms after SNM deactivation and requested removal).

conclusionWithin the current limited evidence, the decision regarding SNM activation or deactivation should be individualized. A registry for those patients is recommended.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansImplantable NeurostimulatorsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsSacrumUrination DisordersDelivery and outcomePregnancySacral neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID28160010
OpenAlexW2584525038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.