Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28159966›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2018

DNA copy number profiling using single-cell sequencing.

Xuefeng Wang, Hao Chen, Nancy R Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A zero-agnostic model for copy number evolution in cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. High-throughput single-сell sequencing in cancer research.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Copy Number Variation Detection by Single-Cell DNA Sequencing with SCOPE.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuefeng WangH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Hao ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Davis, CA.
Nancy R ZhangWharton School Statistics Department, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI John L. Cleveland · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Training and Education ProgramP20CA192994 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI LI, ELLEN · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA192994NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is a lack of software for detecting copy number variations and constructing copy number profile for the whole genome from single-cell DNA sequencing data, which are often of low coverage and high technical noises. Here we introduce a new toolkit, SCNV, which features an efficient bin-free segmentation approach and provides the highest resolution possible for breakpoint detection and the subsequent copy number calling. SCNV can auto-tune parameters based on a set of normal cells from the same batch to adjust for the technical noise level of the data, facilitating its application to data gathered from different platforms and different studies.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsSoftwareComputational BiologyDNA, NeoplasmGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasmsPloidiesSequence Analysis, DNASingle-Cell AnalysisDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID28159966
PMCPMC6171490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.