Trial reportCirculation. Heart failure2017
Aortic Waveform Analysis to Individualize Treatment in Heart Failure.
Trial report in Circulation. Heart failure, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00588692 (Strategies for Aggressive Central Afterload Reduction in Patients With Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategies for Aggressive Central Afterload Reduction in Patients With Heart Failure
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arterial Stiffening With Exercise in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2017Trial
- Time-frequency machine learning transfer function for central pressure waveforms.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Impact of Insulin-Induced Relative Hypoglycemia on Vascular Insulin Sensitivity and Central Hemodynamics in Prediabetes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Heart Failure: Insights From the Arterial Waves.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Impact of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition on vascular function in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A pilot study.Physiological reports · 2022Article
- Exercise Intolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Arterial Stiffness and Aabnormal Left Ventricular Hemodynamic Responses During Exercise.Journal of cardiac failure · 2021Article
- Prognostic value of aerobic capacity and exercise oxygen pulse in postaortic dissection patients.Clinical cardiology · 2021Article
- Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index Reflects Impaired Exercise Capacity and Predicts Adverse Prognosis in Patients With Heart Failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- The Role of Arterial Stiffness and Central Hemodynamics in Heart Failure.International journal of heart failure · 2020Review
- Association of homocysteine with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in a southern Chinese population.Aging · 2019Article
- Functional aging in health and heart failure: the COmPLETE Study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2019Article
- Pulsatile arterial haemodynamics in heart failure.European heart journal · 2018Review
- Effects of Dietary Inorganic Nitrate Supplementation on Exercise Performance in Patients With Heart Failure: Protocol for a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2018Article
- Pulse Waveform Analysis: Is It Ready for Prime Time?Current hypertension reports · 2017Review
- 6-minute walking test: a useful tool in the management of heart failure patients.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAfterload reduction is a cornerstone in the management of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction. However, arterial load and the effect of HF therapies on afterload might vary between individuals. Tailoring vasoactive medicines to patients with HF based upon better understanding of arterial afterload may enable better individualization of therapy. METHODS AND
resultsSubjects with HF and reduced ejection fraction underwent aggressive titration of vasoactive HF therapies with assessment of central aortic waveforms analyzed using pulse wave, wave separation, and arterial reservoir models. Clinical response to treatment was assessed using the 6-minute walk test distance, which increased in 25 subjects and decreased or remained unchanged in 13. Subjects with improvement on therapy displayed higher aortic pressure wave pulsatility (central pulse pressure [PP], reflected pressure wave, and reservoir pressure) at study entry compared with subjects without improvement (all P<0.05). Parameters derived by the arterial analysis methods were strongly correlated with one another and displayed similar ability to predict improvement. Aortic pressure pulsatility significantly decreased in subjects with functional improvement, whereas no change was observed in patients without functional improvement (P for interaction <0.05). These differences in arterial load at baseline and on therapy were not apparent from conventional brachial artery cuff pressure assessments.
conclusionsIncreased aortic pressure wave pulsatility and greater decrease in pulsatility on treatment are associated with functional improvement in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction receiving aggressive vasodilator titration. These differences are not identifiable using brachial cuff pressures. Central aortic waveform analysis may enable better individualization of vasoactive therapies in chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00588692.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.