ArticleGenetics2017
Role of Ectopic Gene Conversion in the Evolution of a
Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genomic Insights ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Ectopic Gene Conversion Causing Quantitative Trait Variation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Genomic analyses reveal high diversity and rapid evolution ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Biology and genetic diversity ofVirulence · 2024Article
- Development of a Multiplex PCR Short Tandem Repeat Typing Scheme for Candida krusei.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Inhibitor-Resistant Mutants Give Important Insights into Candida albicans ABC Transporter Cdr1 Substrate Specificity and Help Elucidate Efflux Pump Inhibition.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Article
- PDR TransporterFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Population genomics shows no distinction between pathogenic Candida krusei and environmental Pichia kudriavzevii: One species, four names.PLoS pathogens · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gene duplications enable the evolution of novel gene function, but strong positive selection is required to preserve advantageous mutations in a population. This is because frequent ectopic gene conversions (EGCs) between highly similar, tandem-duplicated, sequences, can rapidly remove fate-determining mutations by replacing them with the neighboring parent gene sequences. Unfortunately, the high sequence similarities between tandem-duplicated genes severely hamper empirical studies of this important evolutionary process, because deciphering their correct sequences is challenging. In this study, we employed the eukaryotic model organism
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.