ArticleGenetics2017
Requirements for Driving Antipathogen Effector Genes into Populations of Disease Vectors by Homing.
Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- A model-informed target product profile for population modification gene drives for malaria control.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Performance characteristics allow for confinement of a CRISPR toxin-antidote gene drive for population suppression in a reaction-diffusion model.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Considerations for first field trials of low-threshold gene drive for malaria vector control.Malaria journal · 2024Review
- Manipulating the Destiny of Wild Populations Using CRISPR.Annual review of genetics · 2023Review
- Dispersal inference from population genetic variation using a convolutional neural network.Genetics · 2023Article
- Gene drive designs for efficient and localisable population suppression using Y-linked editors.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Population replacement gene drive characteristics for malaria elimination in a range of seasonal transmission settings: a modelling study.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Spatial modelling for population replacement of mosquito vectors at continental scale.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Driving down malaria transmission with engineered gene drives.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Demographic feedbacks can hamper the spatial spread of a gene drive.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Predicting the spread and persistence of genetically modified dominant sterile male mosquitoes.Parasites & vectors · 2021Article
- Fine-scale estimation of key life-history parameters of malaria vectors: implications for next-generation vector control technologies.Parasites & vectors · 2021Article
- Article
- Double drives and private alleles for localised population genetic control.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Split versions of Cleave and Rescue selfish genetic elements for measured self limiting gene drive.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Split drive killer-rescue provides a novel threshold-dependent gene drive.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Gene Drive Dynamics in Natural Populations: The Importance of Density Dependence, Space, and Sex.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2020Article
- Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need for new interventions against the ongoing burden of vector-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue. One suggestion has been to develop genes encoding effector molecules that block parasite development within the vector, and then use the nuclease-based homing reaction as a form of gene drive to spread those genes through target populations. If the effector gene reduces the fitness of the mosquito and does not contribute to the drive, then loss-of-function mutations in the effector will eventually replace functional copies, but protection may nonetheless persist sufficiently long to provide a public health benefit. Here, we present a quantitative model allowing one to predict the duration of protection as a function of the probabilities of different molecular processes during the homing reaction, various fitness effects, and the efficacy of the effector in blocking transmission. Factors that increase the duration of protection include reducing the frequency of pre-existing resistant alleles, the probability of nonrecombinational DNA repair, the probability of homing-associated loss of the effector, the fitness costs of the nuclease and effector, and the completeness of parasite blocking. For target species that extend over an area much larger than the typical dispersal distance, the duration of protection is expected to be highest at the release site, and decrease away from there, eventually falling to zero, as effector-less drive constructs replace effector-containing ones. We also model an alternative strategy of using the nuclease to target an essential gene, and then linking the effector to a sequence that restores the essential function and is resistant to the nuclease. Depending upon parameter values, this approach can prolong the duration of protection. Our models highlight the key design criteria needed to achieve a desired level of public health benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.