Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28159617›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychologia2017

A brief comparative review of primate posterior parietal cortex: A novel hypothesis on the human toolmaker.

S Kastner, Q Chen, S K Jeong, R E B Mruczek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Oscillatory brain dynamics underlying affective face processing.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Different roles of response covariability and its attentional modulation in the sensory cortex and posterior parietal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S KastnerDepartment of Psychology, USA; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: skastner@princeton.edu.
Q ChenDepartment of Psychology, USA; School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
S K JeongDepartment of Psychology, USA; Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, South Korea.
R E B MruczekDepartment of Psychology, Worcester State University, Worcester, MA 01520, USA.
Korea Brain Research Institute · KRPrinceton University · USSouth China Normal University · CNWorcester State University · US

Funding

Functions of the Thalamus in Perception and CognitionR01EY017699 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SABINE KASTNER · 2007 to 2026
$6.4M
Neural mechanisms of attentionR01MH064043 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KASTNER, SABINE, KNIGHT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
Attentional Functions of the PulvinarR21EY021078 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KASTNER, SABINE · 2010 to 2011
$435k
Dissociating feature- and space-based attention in the frontoparietal networkF32NS063619 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MRUCZEK, RYAN E · 2009 to 2011
$150k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017699NEI NIH HHS R21 EY021078NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064043NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS063619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primate visual system contains two major cortical pathways: a ventral-temporal pathway that has been associated with object processing and recognition, and a dorsal-parietal pathway that has been associated with spatial processing and action guidance. Our understanding of the role of the dorsal pathway, in particular, has greatly evolved within the framework of the two-pathway hypothesis since its original conception. Here, we present a comparative review of the primate dorsal pathway in humans and monkeys based on electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, and neuroanatomical studies. We consider similarities and differences across species in terms of the topographic representation of visual space; specificity for eye, reaching, or grasping movements; multi-modal response properties; and the representation of objects and tools. We also review the relative anatomical location of functionally- and topographically-defined regions of the posterior parietal cortex. An emerging theme from this comparative analysis is that non-spatial information is represented to a greater degree, and with increased complexity, in the human dorsal visual system. We propose that non-spatial information in the primate parietal cortex contributes to the perception-to-action system aimed at manipulating objects in peripersonal space. In humans, this network has expanded in multiple ways, including the development of a dorsal object vision system mirroring the complexity of the ventral stream, the integration of object information with parietal working memory systems, and the emergence of tool-specific object representations in the anterior intraparietal sulcus and regions of the inferior parietal lobe. We propose that these evolutionary changes have enabled the emergence of human-specific behaviors, such as the sophisticated use of tools.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingHumansMemory, Short-TermMovementNeuroimagingParietal LobePrimatesPsychomotor PerformanceSpecies SpecificityVisual PathwaysDorsal pathwayElectrophysiologyNeuroimagingObject visionToolsVisual-motor transformation

Identifiers

PMID28159617
PMCPMC5537042
OpenAlexW2583759425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.