Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28159442›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2017

Does patient activation predict the course of type 2 diabetes? A longitudinal study.

Rebecca M Sacks, Jessica Greene, Judith Hibbard, Valerie Overton, Carmen D Parrotta

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05541120 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Remote Patient Monitoring and Patient Education on Patient Activation and Glycemic Control in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorTracy Jalbuena MDRan2022 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsRemote Patient Monitoring
NCT05571306 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Can Diabetes Distress be Reduced by Improving Entry to Care for People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cluster-randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2022 to 2024Enrolled512ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, Diabetes DistressArmsfour core components care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca M SacksSchool of Nursing, George Washington University, 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 500, Washington, District Of Columbia 20006, United States. Electronic address: Rebecca.sacks@gmail.com.
Jessica GreeneMarxe School of Public and International Affairs, New York, NY, United States.
Judith HibbardDepartment of Planning, Public Policy, and Management, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Valerie OvertonFairview Health Services, Minneapolis, MN 55407, United States.
Carmen D ParrottaFairview Health Services, Minneapolis, MN 55407, United States.
Fairview Health Services · USGeorge Washington University · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine whether patient activation is predictive of the course of diabetes over a three year period among patients with and without diabetes.

methodsLongitudinal analyses utilized electronic health record data from 2011 to 2014. We examined how the patient activation measure (PAM) was predictive of 2014 diabetes-related outcomes among patients with diabetes (n=10,071); pre-diabetes (n=1804); and neither diabetes nor pre-diabetes (n=46,402). Outcomes were clinical indicators (blood pressure, cholesterol, and trigylcerides), costly utilization, and progression from no diabetes to pre-diabetes or diabetes.

resultsHigher PAM level predicted better clinical indicator control in patients with diabetes. In patients with pre-diabetes, PAM level predicted better clinical indicator control, and those in the highest level of PAM in 2011 had lower odds of having a hospitalization compared to those in the lowest level. In patients without diabetes or pre-diabetes in 2011, higher PAM level was associated with lower odds of developing pre-diabetes.

conclusionsMore activated patients with diabetes and pre-diabetes had better outcomes than less activated patients. More activated patients without diabetes or pre-diabetes were less likely to develop pre-diabetes over a three year period. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Strategies to improve patient activation may be useful to help curb the diabetes epidemic.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsFemaleHospitalizationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTreatment OutcomeDiabetesPatient activationPre-diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28159442
OpenAlexW2580172492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.