Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158995›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Declining rates of health problems associated with crack smoking during the expansion of crack pipe distribution in Vancouver, Canada.

Amy Prangnell, Huiru Dong, Patricia Daly, M J Milloy, Thomas Kerr, Kanna Hayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy PrangnellBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, Urban Health Research Initiative, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Huiru DongBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, Urban Health Research Initiative, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Patricia DalyVancouver Coastal Health, #800-601 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4C2, Canada.
M J MilloyBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, Urban Health Research Initiative, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Thomas KerrBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, Urban Health Research Initiative, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Kanna HayashiBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, Urban Health Research Initiative, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. uhri-kh@cfenet.ubc.ca.

Funding

Vancouver Drug Users Study: The Impacts of Evolving Drug Use Patterns on HIV/AIDSU01DA038886 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI DEBECK, KORA, HAYASHI, KANNA · 2015 to 2024
$12.1M
Impacts of universal access to HIV/AIDS care among HIV+ injection drug usersR01DA021525 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI MILLOY, M-J · 2007 to 2016
$5.8M
CIHR MSH-141971NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021525NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA038886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrack cocaine smoking is associated with an array of negative health consequences, including cuts and burns from unsafe pipes, and infectious diseases such as HIV. Despite the well-established and researched harm reduction programs for injection drug users, little is known regarding the potential for harm reduction programs targeting crack smoking to reduce health problems from crack smoking. In the wake of recent crack pipe distribution services expansion, we utilized data from long running cohort studies to estimate the impact of crack pipe distribution services on the rates of health problems associated with crack smoking in Vancouver, Canada.

methodsData were derived from two prospective cohort studies of community-recruited people who inject drugs in Vancouver between December 2005 and November 2014. We employed multivariable generalized estimating equations to examine the relationship between crack pipe acquisition sources and self-reported health problems associated with crack smoking (e.g., cut fingers/sores, coughing blood) among people reported smoking crack.

resultsAmong 1718 eligible participants, proportions of those obtaining crack pipes only through health service points have significantly increased from 7.2% in 2005 to 62.3% in 2014 (p < 0.001), while the rates of reporting health problems associated with crack smoking have significantly declined (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, compared to those obtaining pipes only through other sources (e.g., on the street, self-made), those acquiring pipes through health service points only were significantly less likely to report health problems from smoking crack (adjusted odds ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.93).

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the expansion of crack pipe distribution services has likely served to reduce health problems from smoking crack in this setting. They provide evidence supporting crack pipe distribution programs as a harm reduction service for crack smokers.

Indexed as

Crack CocaineHarm ReductionAdultBritish ColumbiaCocaine-Related DisordersEquipment and SuppliesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesRisk-TakingCrack CocaineCrack pipe acquisitionCrack smokingHarm reduction

Identifiers

PMID28158995
PMCPMC5292004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.