Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158984›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Refining a questionnaire to assess breast cancer knowledge and barriers to screening in Kenya: Psychometric assessment of the BCAM.

J Wachira, A Busakhala, F Chite, V Naanyu, J Kisuya, G Otieno, A Keter, A Mwangi, T Inui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J WachiraAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya. wachirajuddy@gmail.com.
A BusakhalaAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya.
F ChiteAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya.
V NaanyuAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya.
J KisuyaAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya.
G OtienoAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya.
A KeterAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya.
A MwangiAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya.
T InuiAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) Partnership, P.O Box 4604-30100, Eldoret, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur study objective was to determine the validity and reliability of the breast module of a cancer awareness measure (BCAM) among adult women in western Kenya.

methodsThe study was conducted between October and November 2012, following three breast cancer screening events. Purposive and systematic random sampling methods were used to identity 48 women for cognitive focus group discussions, and 1061 (594 who attended vs. 467 who did not attend screening events) for surveys, respectively. Face and psychometric validity of the BCAM survey was assessed using cognitive testing, factor analysis of survey data, and correlations. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

resultsAmong survey participants, the overall median age was 34 (IQR: 26-44) years. Compared to those women who did not attend the screening events, women attendees were older (median: 35 vs. 32 years, p = 0.001) more often married (79% vs. 72%, p = 0.006), more educated (52% vs. 46% with more than an elementary level of education, p = 0.001), more unemployed (59% vs. 11%, p = 0.001), more likely to report doing breast self-examination (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.001) and more likely to report having felt a breast lump (16% vs. 7%, p = 0.001). For domain 1 on knowledge of breast cancer symptoms, one factor (three items) with Eigen value of 1.76 emerged for the group that did not attend screening, and 1.50 for the group that attended screening. For both groups two factors (factor 1 "internal influences" and factor 2 "external influences") emerged among domain 4 on barriers to screening, with varied item loadings and Eigen values. There were no statistically significant differences in the factor scores between attendees and non-attendees. There were significant associations between factor scores and other attributes of the surveyed population, including associations with occupation, transportation type, and training for and practice of breast self-examination. Cronbach's alpha showed an acceptable internal consistency.

conclusionCertain subpopulations are less likely than others to attend breast screening in Kenya. A survey measure of breast cancer knowledge and perceived barriers to screening shows promise for use in Kenya for characterizing clinical and community population beliefs, but needs adaptation for setting, language and culture.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBreast NeoplasmsFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansKenyaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBarriers to screeningBreast cancerKenyaKnowledgePsychometric assessment

Identifiers

PMID28158984
PMCPMC5291974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.