Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158969›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2017

Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array.

Lori L Hinze, Amanda M Hulse-Kemp, Iain W Wilson, Qian-Hao Zhu, Danny J Llewellyn, Jen M Taylor, Andrew Spriggs, David D Fang, Mauricio Ulloa, John J Burke and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Speed breeding in upland cotton (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A genome-wide comparative analysis of bZIP transcription factors inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Lori L HinzeUSDA-ARS, Crop Germplasm Research Unit, College Station, TX, 77845, USA. Lori.Hinze@ars.usda.gov.
Amanda M Hulse-KempDepartment of Plant Sciences and Seed Biotechnology Center, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Iain W WilsonCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Qian-Hao ZhuCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Danny J LlewellynCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Jen M TaylorCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Andrew SpriggsCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
David D FangUSDA-ARS, Cotton Fiber Bioscience Research Unit, New Orleans, LA, 70124, USA.
Mauricio UlloaUSDA-ARS, Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research Unit, Lubbock, TX, 79415, USA.
John J BurkeUSDA-ARS, Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research Unit, Lubbock, TX, 79415, USA.
Marc GibandCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, F34398, France.
Jean-Marc LacapeCIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, F34398, France.
Allen Van DeynzeDepartment of Plant Sciences and Seed Biotechnology Center, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Joshua A UdallPlant and Wildlife Science Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
Jodi A SchefflerUSDA-ARS, Jamie Whitten Delta States Research Center, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA.
Steve HagueDepartment of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Jonathan F WendelDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Alan E PepperDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
James FrelichowskiUSDA-ARS, Crop Germplasm Research Unit, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
Cindy T LawleyIllumina Inc., 499 Illinois Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Don C JonesCotton Incorporated, Agricultural Research, Cary, NC, 27513, USA.
Richard G PercyUSDA-ARS, Crop Germplasm Research Unit, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
David M StellyDepartment of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. stelly@tamu.edu.
Agricultural Research Service · USCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUTexas A&M University · USAgriculture and Food · AUCotton (United States) · USCropping Systems Research Laboratory · USGenetic Improvement and Adaptation of Mediterranean and Tropical Plants · FRUniversity of California, Davis · USBrigham Young University · USIllumina (United States) · USIowa State University · USMississippi Delta Community College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCotton germplasm resources contain beneficial alleles that can be exploited to develop germplasm adapted to emerging environmental and climate conditions. Accessions and lines have traditionally been characterized based on phenotypes, but phenotypic profiles are limited by the cost, time, and space required to make visual observations and measurements. With advances in molecular genetic methods, genotypic profiles are increasingly able to identify differences among accessions due to the larger number of genetic markers that can be measured. A combination of both methods would greatly enhance our ability to characterize germplasm resources. Recent efforts have culminated in the identification of sufficient SNP markers to establish high-throughput genotyping systems, such as the CottonSNP63K array, which enables a researcher to efficiently analyze large numbers of SNP markers and obtain highly repeatable results. In the current investigation, we have utilized the SNP array for analyzing genetic diversity primarily among cotton cultivars, making comparisons to SSR-based phylogenetic analyses, and identifying loci associated with seed nutritional traits.

resultsThe SNP markers distinctly separated G. hirsutum from other Gossypium species and distinguished the wild from cultivated types of G. hirsutum. The markers also efficiently discerned differences among cultivars, which was the primary goal when designing the CottonSNP63K array. Population structure within the genus compared favorably with previous results obtained using SSR markers, and an association study identified loci linked to factors that affect cottonseed protein content.

conclusionsOur results provide a large genome-wide variation data set for primarily cultivated cotton. Thousands of SNPs in representative cotton genotypes provide an opportunity to finely discriminate among cultivated cotton from around the world. The SNPs will be relevant as dense markers of genome variation for association mapping approaches aimed at correlating molecular polymorphisms with variation in phenotypic traits, as well as for molecular breeding approaches in cotton.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenotypeGossypiumMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyPlant ProteinsGenetic MarkersPlant ProteinsBreedingCottonDiversity analysisGenome-wide association analysisGermplasm collectionMolecular markersSeed protein content

Identifiers

PMID28158969
PMCPMC5291959
OpenAlexW2583631036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.