Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158874›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2017

A balance of activity in brain control and reward systems predicts self-regulatory outcomes.

Richard B Lopez, Pin-Hao A Chen, Jeremy F Huckins, Wilhelm Hofmann, William M Kelley, Todd F Heatherton

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04279483 (Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04279483 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2019 to 2024Enrolled343ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco, Smoking, Smoking, CigaretteArmsTobacco retailer, Non-tobacco retailer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. How we decide what to eat: Toward an interdisciplinary model of gut-brain interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. After-effects of self-control: The reward responsivity hypothesis.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural predictors of eating behavior and dietary change.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard B LopezDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Pin-Hao A ChenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Jeremy F HuckinsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Wilhelm HofmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
William M KelleyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Todd F HeathertonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

Funding

Neural Predictors of Self-Regulation Failure and Success for Appetitive BehaviorR01DA022582 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HAXBY, JAMES V · 2006 to 2017
$3.8M
Neural predictors of real world appetitive and addictive behaviorsF31CA177203 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI LOPEZ, RICHARD · 2013 to 2016
$152k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA177203NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging work has shown that increased reward-related activity following exposure to food cues is predictive of self-control failure. The balance model suggests that self-regulation failures result from an imbalance in reward and executive control mechanisms. However, an open question is whether the relative balance of activity in brain systems associated with executive control (vs reward) supports self-regulatory outcomes when people encounter tempting cues in daily life. Sixty-nine chronic dieters, a population known for frequent lapses in self-control, completed a food cue-reactivity task during an fMRI scanning session, followed by a weeklong sampling of daily eating behaviors via ecological momentary assessment. We related participants' food cue activity in brain systems associated with executive control and reward to real-world eating patterns. Specifically, a balance score representing the amount of activity in brain regions associated with self-regulatory control, relative to automatic reward-related activity, predicted dieters' control over their eating behavior during the following week. This balance measure may reflect individual self-control capacity and be useful for examining self-regulation success in other domains and populations.

Indexed as

RewardSelf-ControlAdolescentBrainBrain MappingCuesDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleFoodHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingYoung AdultdietingfMRIindividual differencesrewardself-control

Identifiers

PMID28158874
PMCPMC5460048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.