Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158612›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Accurate prediction of human essential genes using only nucleotide composition and association information.

Feng-Biao Guo, Chuan Dong, Hong-Li Hua, Shuo Liu, Hao Luo, Hong-Wan Zhang, Yan-Ting Jin, Kai-Yue Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Essential gene prediction inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Feng-Biao GuoSchool of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology and Key Laboratory for Neuro-information of the Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Chuan DongSchool of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology and Key Laboratory for Neuro-information of the Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hong-Li HuaSchool of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology and Key Laboratory for Neuro-information of the Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Shuo LiuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology and Key Laboratory for Neuro-information of the Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hao LuoDepartment of Physics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Hong-Wan ZhangSchool of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology and Key Laboratory for Neuro-information of the Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yan-Ting JinSchool of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology and Key Laboratory for Neuro-information of the Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Kai-Yue ZhangSchool of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology and Key Laboratory for Neuro-information of the Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNTianjin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationPreviously constructed classifiers in predicting eukaryotic essential genes integrated a variety of features including experimental ones. If we can obtain satisfactory prediction using only nucleotide (sequence) information, it would be more promising. Three groups recently identified essential genes in human cancer cell lines using wet experiments and it provided wonderful opportunity to accomplish our idea. Here we improved the Z curve method into the λ-interval form to denote nucleotide composition and association information and used it to construct the SVM classifying model.

resultsOur model accurately predicted human gene essentiality with an AUC higher than 0.88 both for 5-fold cross-validation and jackknife tests. These results demonstrated that the essentiality of human genes could be reliably reflected by only sequence information. We re-predicted the negative dataset by our Pheg server and 118 genes were additionally predicted as essential. Among them, 20 were found to be homologues in mouse essential genes, indicating that some of the 118 genes were indeed essential, however previous experiments overlooked them. As the first available server, Pheg could predict essentiality for anonymous gene sequences of human. It is also hoped the λ-interval Z curve method could be effectively extended to classification issues of other DNA elements. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://cefg.uestc.edu.cn/Pheg. CONTACT: fbguo@uestc.edu.cn. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Base CompositionGenes, EssentialSoftwareAnimalsEukaryotaHumansMiceModels, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID28158612
PMCPMC7110051
OpenAlexW2949280944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.