Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158558›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2017

Step Care treatment for smoking cessation.

Jon O Ebbert, Melissa A Little, Robert C Klesges, Zoran Bursac, Karen C Johnson, Fridtjof Thomas, Mark W Vander Weg

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jon O EbbertMayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Melissa A LittleCenter for Population Sciences, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Heath Science Center, 66 North Pauline Street, Suite 633, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Robert C KlesgesCenter for Population Sciences, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Heath Science Center, 66 North Pauline Street, Suite 633, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Zoran BursacCenter for Population Sciences, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Heath Science Center, 66 North Pauline Street, Suite 633, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Karen C JohnsonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Heath Science Center, 66 North Pauline Street, Suite 633, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Fridtjof ThomasDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Heath Science Center, 66 North Pauline Street, Suite 633, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Mark W Vander WegDepartments of Internal Medicine and Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA and.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jon C.D. Houtman · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of a ‘stepped care’ approach with increasing treatment intensity (‘Step Care’) to one with repeated treatments (‘Recycle’) among cigarette smokers interested in quitting smoking. Step 1 of the Step Care intervention consisted of a single counseling session, nicotine patch for six weeks and telephonic contact. For smokers not achieving tobacco abstinence 6 months after randomization with Step 1, the intensity of the intervention increased to four counseling sessions, bupropion sustained-release, nine telephone calls and three mailings (Step 2). For those not achieving tobacco abstinence 12 months after randomization, smokers received six behavioral counseling sessions, nicotine patch and nicotine gum, nine telephone calls and three mailings (Step 3). The Recycle participants received one session of health behavior counseling, six weeks of the nicotine patch and a telephone call at each step. 270 cigarette smokers were randomized. At 24 months after randomization using an intention to treat analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed in prolonged smoking abstinence between the Step Care and Recycle condition (16.9% versus 9.4%; adjusted OR = 1.88; 95% CI 0.88–4.01; P =0.10). Additional research is needed to explore whether a stepped care intervention increases long-term smoking abstinence rates compared with repeating the same intervention.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationAdultBupropionCounselingFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelephoneTime FactorsTobacco Use Cessation DevicesBupropion

Identifiers

PMID28158558
PMCPMC5914340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.