Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158510›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2017

Reduced blood pressure-lowering effect of catheter-based renal denervation in patients with isolated systolic hypertension: data from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry.

Felix Mahfoud, George Bakris, Deepak L Bhatt, Murray Esler, Sebastian Ewen, Martin Fahy, David Kandzari, Kazuomi Kario, Giuseppe Mancia, Michael Weber and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01418261 nacompletednot on this map

Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN-3)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedtronic VascularRan2011 to 2017Enrolled535ConditionsUncontrolled HypertensionArmsRenal denervation (Symplicity Catheter System), Renal angiogram
NCT01534299 recruitingnot on this map

Global SYMPLICITY Registry (GSR) Denervation Findings in Real World (DEFINE)

TypeobservationalSponsorMedtronic VascularRan2012 to 2031Enrolled5,000ConditionsHypertensionArmsMedtronic Renal Denervation System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Pacemaker-Mediated Programmable Hypertension Control Therapy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Renal Denervation in Cardiovascular Diseases: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Expanding Applications.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Overcoming variable response in renal denervation: Key strategies for reliable clinical implementation.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  9. Patient Selection and Renal Denervation.Current hypertension reports · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. 2022 Renal denervation therapy for the treatment of hypertension: a statement from the Thai Hypertension Society.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  15. Renal denervation in the management of hypertension in adults. A clinical consensus statement of the ESC Council on Hypertension and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessment of arterial stiffness to predict blood pressure response to renal sympathetic denervation.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Felix MahfoudKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Str., Geb. 40, Homburg/Saar 66421, Germany.
George BakrisUniversity of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Deepak L BhattBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Murray EslerBaker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Sebastian EwenKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Str., Geb. 40, Homburg/Saar 66421, Germany.
Martin FahyMedtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.
David KandzariPiedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kazuomi KarioJichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Giuseppe ManciaUniversity of Milano-Bicocca and Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Michael WeberSUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Michael BöhmKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Str., Geb. 40, Homburg/Saar 66421, Germany.
Saarland University · DEBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUBrigham and Women's Hospital · USIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITJichi Medical University · JPMedtronic (United States) · USPiedmont Atlanta Hospital · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Catheter-based renal artery denervation (RDN) has been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) in certain patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) (systolic BP [SBP] ≥140 mmHg and diastolic BP <90 mmHg), characterized by increased vascular stiffness, is the predominant hypertensive phenotype in elderly patients. This study compared baseline characteristics and SBP change at 6 months between patients with ISH and combined systolic–diastolic hypertension (CH). Methods and Results: This study pooled data from 1103 patients from SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. A total of 429 patients had ISH, and 674 had CH. Patients with ISH were significantly older than those with CH (66 vs. 55 years), had more type 2 diabetes mellitus (52.9 vs. 34.6%), and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (71.8 vs. 78.6 mL/min/1.73 m2); all P < 0.001. At 6 months, the SBP drop for CH patients was −18.7 ± 23.7 mmHg compared with a reduction of −10.9 ± 21.7 mmHg for ISH patients −7.8 mmHg, 95% confidence interval, CI, −10.5, −5.1, P < 0.001). The change in 24-h SBP at 6 months was −8.8 ± 16.2 mmHg in patients with CH vs. −5.8 ± 15.4 mmHg in ISH (−3.0 mmHg, 95% CI −5.4, −0.6, P = 0.015). Presence of ISH at baseline but not age was associated with less pronounced BP changes following the procedure. The strongest predictor of office SBP reduction at 6 months was CH, followed by aldosterone antagonist use and non-use of vasodilators. Conclusion: The reduction in BP among patients with ISH following RDN was less pronounced than the reduction in patients with CH. Clinical.trials.gov Identifiers: NCT01534299 and NCT01418261.

Indexed as

AgedCatheter AblationFemaleHumansHypertension, RenalMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRenal ArterySympathectomySystole

Identifiers

PMID28158510
PMCPMC5381589
OpenAlexW2492725378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.