Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158490›Full record

ReviewHealth education research2017

Perceptions and use of electronic cigarettes in pregnancy.

Andrea McCubbin, Amanda Fallin-Bennett, Janine Barnett, Kristin Ashford

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health education research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Birth Outcomes Associated With E-Cigarette and Non-E-Cigarette Tobacco Product Use During Pregnancy: An Examination of PATH Data Waves 1-5.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Impact of E-cig aerosol vaping on fetal and neonatal respiratory development and function.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea McCubbinCollege of Nursing, Office for Nursing Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Amanda Fallin-BennettCollege of Nursing, Office for Nursing Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Janine BarnettCollege of Nursing, Office for Nursing Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Kristin AshfordCollege of Nursing, Office for Nursing Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

The impact of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) on perinatal immune responsiveness and birth outcomes in AppalachiaR01DA040694 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ASHFORD, KRISTIN H. · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) is quickly growing in the United States, despite the unknown health implications and unregulated device contents. Although research is emerging around e-cigs in general, there continues to be a lack of scientific evidence regarding the safety and risks of e-cig use on maternal and fetal health, even though adverse health effects of nicotine on maternal and fetal outcomes are documented. This review summarizes existing perceptions of e-cig use in pregnancy, based on the limited number of publications available, and highlights the necessity of conducting additional research in this field of public health. Authors conducted a literature search of scientific peer-reviewed articles published from January 2006 to October 2016, comprising more than a decade of research. Search keywords include ‘tobacco use’, ‘electronic cigarette(s)’ and ‘pregnancy’. Fifty-seven publications were identified, narrowed to fifteen by screening title/abstract for potential relevance, with seven articles chosen for final inclusion. Of these seven studies, most participants not only believed e-cigs pose risks to maternal and child health but also perceived e-cigs as a safer and potentially healthier alternative to traditional cigarettes, and may assist with smoking cessation. Further research is needed to determine health implications and provide clinical guidelines for e-cig use in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsPerceptionPrenatal CareFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPregnancySmoking CessationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28158490
PMCPMC5914445
OpenAlexW2585292848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.