Trial reportEuropean heart journal2017
Systolic blood pressure, cardiovascular outcomes and efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: results from PARADIGM-HF.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Sacubitril/valsartan, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and vericiguat for congestive heart failure therapy.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2022Pooled it
- Prognostic value of blood pressure in ambulatory heart failure: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ambulatory blood pressure predicts heart failure prognosis.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Empagliflozin in resistant hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial.European heart journal · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of ivabradine in heart failure patients with a high-risk profile (analysis from the SHIFT trial).ESC heart failure · 2023Trial
- Empagliflozin, irrespective of blood pressure, improves outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial.European heart journal · 2023Trial
- The Difference between Sacubitril Valsartan and Valsartan on Vascular Endothelial Function, APN, MMP-9, and BNP Levels in Patients with Hypertension and Chronic Heart Failure.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Trial
- Systolic Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Trial
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Blood Pressure, and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.JACC. Heart failure · 2020Trial
- Associations between antihypertensive drug-related gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients: a gene-drug interaction study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The effects of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan in experimentally induced chronic kidney disease.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Identification and prognosis of low office and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with heart failure.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Novel pharmacological approaches to lowering blood pressure and managing hypertension.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Population Gap for Chronic Heart Failure Patients Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Japan's Super-Aged Society.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Sacubitril/valsartan in a wide spectrum of heart failure patients (from mechanisms of action to outcomes in specific populations).Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibitor Therapy: A Retrospective Chart Study.Innovations in pharmacy · 2025Article
- Tolerability for older, persistence for younger: a real-world evidence on sacubitril/valsartan in an Asian heart failure cohort across age.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Characteristics, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction According to a 1-Year Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Observational
- Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Compared to heart failure patients with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP), those with lower SBP have a worse prognosis. To make matters worse, the latter patients often do not receive treatment with life-saving therapies that might lower blood pressure further. We examined the association between SBP and outcomes in the Prospective Comparison of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF), as well as the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, compared with enalapril, according to baseline SBP. Methods: We analysed the effect of treatment on SBP and on the primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization), its components and all-cause death. We examined baseline SBP as a categorical (<110, 110 to < 120, 120 to < 130, 130 to < 140 and ≥140 mmHg) and continuous variable, as well as average in-trial SBP and time-updated SBP. Findings: All-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were highest in patients with the lowest SBP whereas there was a U-shaped relationship between SBP and the rate of heart failure hospitalization. The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril was consistent across all baseline SBP categories for all outcomes. For example, the sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril hazard ratio for the primary endpoint was 0.88 (95%CI 0.74-1.06) in patients with a baseline SBP <110 mmHg and 0.81 (0.65-1.02) for those with a SBP ≥140 mmHg (P for interaction = 0.55). Symptomatic hypotension, study drug dose-reduction and discontinuation were more frequent in patients with a lower SBP. Interpretation: In PARADIGM-HF, patients with lower SBP at randomization, notably after tolerating full doses of both study drugs during a run-in period, were at higher risk but generally tolerated sacubitril/valsartan and had the same relative benefit over enalapril as patients with higher baseline SBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.