Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158395›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Evaluation of the Clinical and Microbiological Response to Salmonella Paratyphi A Infection in the First Paratyphoid Human Challenge Model.

Hazel C Dobinson, Malick M Gibani, Claire Jones, Helena B Thomaides-Brears, Merryn Voysey, Thomas C Darton, Claire S Waddington, Danielle Campbell, Iain Milligan, Liqing Zhou and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02100397 (Development of a Human Model of Salmonella Enterica Serovar Paratyphi A Challenge in Healthy Adult Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02100397 nacompletednot on this map

Development of a Human Model of Salmonella Enterica Serovar Paratyphi A Challenge in Healthy Adult Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2014 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsEnteric Fever Caused by Salmonella Enterica Serovar Paratyphi AArmsSalmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A (strain NVGH308)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Multivalent vaccines for invasiveInfection and immunity · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. A defined microbiota mouse model forFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. TheVaccines · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Controlled Human Infection Model for Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Hazel C DobinsonOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Malick M GibaniOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Claire JonesOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Helena B Thomaides-BrearsOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Merryn VoyseyOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Thomas C DartonOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Claire S WaddingtonOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Danielle CampbellOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Iain MilliganOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Liqing ZhouOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Sonu ShresthaOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Simon A KerridgeOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Anna PetersOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Zoe StevensOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Audino PoddaGSK Vaccines Institute for Global Health, Siena, Italy.
Laura B MartinGSK Vaccines Institute for Global Health, Siena, Italy.
Flavia D'AlessioEuropean Vaccine Initiative, Heidelberg, Germany.
Duy Pham ThanhHospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Buddha BasnyatOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Stephen BakerHospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Brian AngusNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Myron M LevineCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Christoph J BlohmkeOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Andrew J PollardOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To expedite the evaluation of vaccines against paratyphoid fever, we aimed to develop the first human challenge model of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A infection. Methods: Two groups of 20 participants underwent oral challenge with S. Paratyphi A following sodium bicarbonate pretreatment at 1 of 2 dose levels (group 1: 1-5 × 103 colony-forming units [CFU] and group 2: 0.5-1 × 103 CFU). Participants were monitored in an outpatient setting with daily clinical review and collection of blood and stool cultures. Antibiotic treatment was started when prespecified diagnostic criteria were met (temperature ≥38°C for ≥12 hours and/or bacteremia) or at day 14 postchallenge. Results: The primary study objective was achieved following challenge with 1-5 × 103 CFU (group 1), which resulted in an attack rate of 12 of 20 (60%). Compared with typhoid challenge, paratyphoid was notable for high rates of subclinical bacteremia (at this dose, 11/20 [55%]). Despite limited symptoms, bacteremia persisted for up to 96 hours after antibiotic treatment (median duration of bacteremia, 53 hours [interquartile range, 24-85 hours]). Shedding of S. Paratyphi A in stool typically preceded onset of bacteremia. Conclusions: Challenge with S. Paratyphi A at a dose of 1-5 × 103 CFU was well tolerated and associated with an acceptable safety profile. The frequency and persistence of bacteremia in the absence of clinical symptoms was notable, and markedly different from that seen in previous typhoid challenge studies. We conclude that the paratyphoid challenge model is suitable for the assessment of vaccine efficacy using endpoints that include bacteremia and/or symptomatology. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02100397.

Indexed as

AdultBacteremiaBloodFecesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedParatyphoid FeverSalmonella paratyphi ATemperatureTime FactorsYoung Adultenteric feverhuman challenge studyimmune responsesparatyphoid infectionSalmonella enterica paratyphi A

Identifiers

PMID28158395
PMCPMC5439345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.