Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158286›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Prognostic significance of SETBP1 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and chronic neutrophilic leukemia: A meta-analysis.

Li-Hong Shou, Dan Cao, Xiao-Hui Dong, Qiu Fang, Ying Wu, Yan Zhang, Ju-Ping Fei, Bao-Lian Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia and Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Mouse Models of CMML.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Molecular Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li-Hong ShouDepartment of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Dan CaoDepartment of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiao-Hui DongDepartment of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qiu FangDepartment of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ying WuDepartment of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ju-Ping FeiDepartment of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Bao-Lian XuDepartment of Hematology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Huzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis meta-analysis investigates the prognostic effect of SET binding protein 1 (SETBP1) mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL).

methodsEligible studies from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through April 2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) were pooled to calculate the prognostic significance of SETBP1 mutation in patients.

resultsA total of 12 studies with 2321 patients were included in this meta-analysis; 4 studies for MDS, 5 studies for CMML, and 3 studies for CNL. Pooled results suggested that MDS and CMML patients with SETBP1 mutations had a significantly poorer prognosis when compared with patients with wild-type SETBP1 (MDS: HR = 1.808, 95% CI (1.218-2.685), P = 0.001; CMML: HR = 2.223, 95% CI (1.493-3.308), P<0.001). SETBP1 mutations in CNL patients however, showed no significant effect on the overall survival (HR = 1.773, 95% CI (0.877-3.582), P = 0.111). The Begg's and Egger's tests did not show significant publication bias in any groups.

conclusionsCurrent evidence shows that SETBP1 mutation is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with MDS and CMML, but not in patients with CNL.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsHumansLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicLeukemia, Neutrophilic, ChronicMutationMyelodysplastic SyndromesNuclear ProteinsPrognosisCarrier ProteinsNuclear ProteinsSETBP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28158286
PMCPMC5291491
OpenAlexW2585243848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.