Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158269›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Predictors of opioid efficacy in patients with chronic pain: A prospective multicenter observational cohort study.

Kasper Grosen, Anne E Olesen, Mikkel Gram, Torsten Jonsson, Michael Kamp-Jensen, Trine Andresen, Christian Nielsen, Gorazd Pozlep, Mogens Pfeiffer-Jensen, Bart Morlion and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The search for pain biomarkers in the human brain.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2018
    Review
  5. Medical Management of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kasper GrosenMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-899X
Anne E OlesenMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Mikkel GramMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Torsten JonssonValdemar Hospital, Ringsted, Denmark.
Michael Kamp-JensenValdemar Hospital, Ringsted, Denmark.
Trine AndresenFriklinikken, Region of Southern Denmark, Give, Denmark.
Christian NielsenFriklinikken, Region of Southern Denmark, Give, Denmark.
Gorazd PozlepDepartment of Anaesthetics and Surgical Intensive Care, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mogens Pfeiffer-JensenDepartment of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bart MorlionLeuven Centre for Algology & Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Pellenberg, Belgium.
Asbjørn M DrewesMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioids are increasingly used for treatment of chronic pain. However, they are only effective in a subset of patients and have multiple side effects. Thus, studies using biomarkers for response are highly warranted. The current study prospectively examined 63 opioid-naïve patients initiating opioid use for diverse types of chronic pain at five European centers. Quantitative sensory testing, electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, and assessment of pain catastrophizing were performed prior to treatment. The co-primary outcomes were change from baseline in ratings of chronic pain and quality of life after 14 days of opioid treatment. Secondary outcomes included patient's global impression of clinical change and side effects. Logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex were used to identify biomarkers predictive for successful treatment, defined as at least a 30% reduction in average pain intensity or an improvement in quality of life of at least 10 scale points. Fifty-nine patients (94%) completed the study. The mean age was 55 ± 16 years and 69% were females. Pain reduction was predicted by cold pain intensity (OR: 0.69; P = 0.01), pain catastrophizing (OR: 0.82; P = 0.03), relative delta (OR: 0.76; P = 0.03) and beta EEG activity (OR: 1.18; P = 0.04) induced by experimental cold pain. None of the study variables were related to improvement in quality of life. For the first time, individual pain processing characteristics have been linked to opioid response in a mixed chronic pain population. This has the potential to personalize treatment of chronic pain and restrict opioid use to patients with high likelihood for response.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID28158269
PMCPMC5291530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.