ArticlePloS one2017
Recognition of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters using convolutional deep learning neural networks.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 275 citations in OpenAlex.
- EvoSNR-Prom: Predicting promoters at single-nucleotide resolution with label-aware transfer learning of the pretrained EVO model.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- PromoterAtlas: decoding regulatory sequences across Gammaproteobacteria using a transformer model.Nature communications · 2026Article
- PBP_ICBA: a prediction of bacterial promoters in specific organisms using an improved convolutional block attention module.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Closed-form feedback-free learning with forward projection.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Synthetic Biology of Plants and Microbes for Agriculture, Environment, and Future Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Deep learning for regulatory genomics: a survey of models, challenges, and applications.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
- Transcriptional regulation of ubiquitin specific peptidase 2b by farnesoid X receptor and its implications in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- The EcoCyc database (2025).EcoSal Plus · 2025Review
- Computational Pipeline for Targeted Integration and Variable Payload Expression in Bacteriophage Engineering.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Identification and application of bioparts for plant synthetic biology.Molecules and cells · 2025Review
- Enhancing nucleotide sequence representations in genomic analysis with contrastive optimization.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Negative dataset selection impacts machine learning-based predictors for multiple bacterial species promoters.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Engineering artificial 5' regulatory sequences for thermostable protein expression in the extremophileSynthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- iPro-CSAF: identification of promoters based on convolutional spiking neural networks and spiking attention mechanism.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- DeepRice6mA: A convolutional neural network approach for 6mA site prediction in the rice Genome.PloS one · 2025Article
- A conserved pilin from uncultured gut bacterial clade TANB77 enhances cancer immunotherapy.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Predicting Promoters in Multiple Prokaryotes with Prompt.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- Understanding the Natural Language of DNA using Encoder-Decoder Foundation Models with Byte-level Precision.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Deep learning approaches for non-coding genetic variant effect prediction: current progress and future prospects.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate computational identification of promoters remains a challenge as these key DNA regulatory regions have variable structures composed of functional motifs that provide gene-specific initiation of transcription. In this paper we utilize Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to analyze sequence characteristics of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters and build their predictive models. We trained a similar CNN architecture on promoters of five distant organisms: human, mouse, plant (Arabidopsis), and two bacteria (Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis). We found that CNN trained on sigma70 subclass of Escherichia coli promoter gives an excellent classification of promoters and non-promoter sequences (Sn = 0.90, Sp = 0.96, CC = 0.84). The Bacillus subtilis promoters identification CNN model achieves Sn = 0.91, Sp = 0.95, and CC = 0.86. For human, mouse and Arabidopsis promoters we employed CNNs for identification of two well-known promoter classes (TATA and non-TATA promoters). CNN models nicely recognize these complex functional regions. For human promoters Sn/Sp/CC accuracy of prediction reached 0.95/0.98/0,90 on TATA and 0.90/0.98/0.89 for non-TATA promoter sequences, respectively. For Arabidopsis we observed Sn/Sp/CC 0.95/0.97/0.91 (TATA) and 0.94/0.94/0.86 (non-TATA) promoters. Thus, the developed CNN models, implemented in CNNProm program, demonstrated the ability of deep learning approach to grasp complex promoter sequence characteristics and achieve significantly higher accuracy compared to the previously developed promoter prediction programs. We also propose random substitution procedure to discover positionally conserved promoter functional elements. As the suggested approach does not require knowledge of any specific promoter features, it can be easily extended to identify promoters and other complex functional regions in sequences of many other and especially newly sequenced genomes. The CNNProm program is available to run at web server http://www.softberry.com.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.