Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158243›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Long-term pulse wave velocity outcomes with aerobic and resistance training in kidney transplant recipients - A pilot randomised controlled trial.

Ellen M O'Connor, Pelagia Koufaki, Thomas H Mercer, Herolin Lindup, Eilish Nugent, David Goldsmith, Iain C Macdougall, Sharlene A Greenwood

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Protocol for the IMPACT Trial: Improving Healthcare Outcomes in American Transplant Recipients Using Culturally-Tailored Novel Technology.Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellen M O'ConnorPhysiotherapy Department, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-6108
Pelagia KoufakiSchool of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Thomas H MercerSchool of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Herolin LindupPhysiotherapy Department, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Eilish NugentDepartment of Renal Medicine, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
David GoldsmithDepartment of Renal Medicine, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Iain C MacdougallDepartment of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sharlene A GreenwoodPhysiotherapy Department, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBQueen Margaret University · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital · GBKing's College - North Carolina · US

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2012-05-874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis pilot study examined long-term pulse wave velocity (PWV) and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) outcomes following a 12-week moderate-intensity aerobic or resistance training programme in kidney transplant recipients.

methodSingle-blind, bi-centre randomised controlled parallel trial. 42 out of 60 participants completed a 9-month follow-up assessment (Aerobic training = 12, Resistance training = 10 and usual care = 20). Participants completed 12 weeks of twice-weekly supervised aerobic or resistance training. Following the 12-week exercise intervention, participants were transitioned to self-managed community exercise activity using motivational interviewing techniques. Usual care participants received usual encouragement for physical activity during routine clinical appointments in the transplant clinic. PWV, VO2peak, blood pressure and body weight were assessed at 12 weeks and 12 months, and compared to baseline.

resultsANCOVA analysis, covarying for baseline values, age, and length of time on dialysis pre-transplantation, revealed a significant mean between-group difference in PWV of -1.30 m/sec (95%CI -2.44 to -0.17, p = 0.03) between resistance training and usual care groups. When comparing the aerobic training and usual care groups at 9-month follow-up, there was a mean difference of -1.05 m/sec (95%CI -2.11 to 0.017, p = 0.05). A significant mean between-group difference in relative VO2peak values of 2.2 ml/kg/min (95% CI 0.37 to 4.03, p = 0.02) when comparing aerobic training with usual care was revealed. There was no significant between group differences in body weight or blood pressure. There were no significant adverse effects associated with the interventions.

conclusionsSignificant between-group differences in 9-month follow-up PWV existed when comparing resistance exercise intervention with usual care. A long-term between-group difference in VO2peak was only evident when comparing aerobic intervention with usual care. This pilot study, with a small sample size, did not aim to elucidate mechanistic mediators related to the exercise interventions. It is however suggested that a motivational interviewing approach, combined with appropriate transition to community training programmes, could maintain the improvements gained from the 12-week exercise interventions and further research in this area is therefore warranted.

trial registrationstudy number: ISRCTN43892586.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationResistance TrainingAdultExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPulse Wave AnalysisSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID28158243
PMCPMC5291475
OpenAlexW2583605472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.