Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158232›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The effects of hospice-shared care for gastric cancer patients.

Kun-Siang Huang, Shih-Ho Wang, Seng-Kee Chuah, Kun-Ming Rau, Yu-Hung Lin, Meng-Che Hsieh, Li-Hsueh Shih, Yen-Hao Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient Factors Associated with Different Hospice Programs in Korea: Analyzing Healthcare Big Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kun-Siang HuangDepartment of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shih-Ho WangDivision of General surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Seng-Kee ChuahGastric cancer team in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kun-Ming RauGastric cancer team in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yu-Hung LinDivision of General surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Meng-Che HsiehGastric cancer team in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Li-Hsueh ShihGastric cancer team in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yen-Hao ChenGastric cancer team in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospice care has been proved to result in changes to the medical behaviors of terminally ill patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects and medical behavior changes of hospice-shared care intervention among terminally ill gastric cancer patients.

methodsA total of 174 patients who died of gastric cancer between 2012 and 2014 were identified. These patients were divided into two groups: a hospice-shared care group (n = 93) and a control group (n = 81).

resultsAmong the 174 patients, 84% had advanced stage (stage III or stage IV) cancer. The females and the patients cared by medical oncologists had a higher percentage of hospice-shared care than the males (71% vs 44%, p = 0.001) and those cared by other physicians (63% vs 41%, p = 0.004). Compared to the control group, the hospice-shared care group underwent lower incidence of life sustaining or aggressive medical treatments, including intensive care unit admission (2% vs 26%, p<0.001), intubation (1% vs 27%, p<0.001), cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation (0% vs 11%, p = 0.001), ventilator use (1% vs 27%, p<0.001), inotropic agent use (8% vs 46%, p<0.001), total or partial parenteral nutrition use (38% vs. 58%, p = 0.029), and blood transfusion (45% vs 74%, p<0.001). Besides, the hospice-shared care group had a higher percentage of palliative treatments than the control group, including signed Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders (95% vs 37%, p<0.001), receiving home hospice care (16% vs 1%, p<0.001), and indicating home as the realistically preferred place of death (41% vs 19%, p = 0.001). The hospice ward admission rate in the hospice-shared care group increased from 30% to 53% from 2012 to 2014.

conclusionThe use of hospice-shared care for gastric cancer patients could increase the rate of signed DNR orders, decrease the use of life sustaining and aggressive/palliative treatments, and improve quality of life.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHospice CareHospicesHospitalizationHumansMalePalliative CareQuality of LifeResuscitation OrdersRetrospective StudiesTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID28158232
PMCPMC5291360
OpenAlexW2584743924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.