Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28158190›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Survival impact of centralization and clinical guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma (A prospective and exhaustive population-based cohort).

Olfa Derbel, Pierre Etienne Heudel, Claire Cropet, Pierre Meeus, Gualter Vaz, Pierre Biron, Philippe Cassier, Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere, Dominique Ranchere-Vince, Olivier Collard and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Olfa DerbelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Pierre Etienne HeudelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Claire CropetDepartment of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Pierre MeeusDepartment of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Gualter VazDepartment of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Pierre BironDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Philippe CassierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Anne-Valérie DecouvelaereDepartment of Pathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Dominique Ranchere-VinceGroupe Sarcome Français, Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Osseuses (GSF-GETO), Lyon France.
Olivier CollardGroupe Sarcome Français, Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Osseuses (GSF-GETO), Lyon France.
Eric De LarocheInstitut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Philippe ThiesseDepartment of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Fadila FarsiRéseau Espace Santé Cancer, Rhône-Alpes, France.
Dominic CellierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
François-Noel GillyClaude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
Jean-Yves BlayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Isabelle Ray-CoquardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe outcome of sarcoma has been suggested in retrospective and non-exhaustive studies to be better through management by a multidisciplinary team of experts and adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). The aim of this prospective and exhaustive population based study was to confirm the impact of adherence to CPGs on survival in patients with localized sarcoma. EXPERIMENTAL

designBetween 2005 and 2007, all evaluable adult patients with a newly diagnosis of localized sarcoma located in Rhone Alpes region (n = 634), including 472 cases of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), were enrolled. The prognostic impact of adherence to CPGs on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by multivariate Cox model in this cohort.

resultsThe median age was 61 years (range 16-92). The most common subtypes were liposarcoma (n = 133, 28%), unclassified sarcoma (n = 98, 20.7%) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 69, 14.6%). In the initial management phase, from diagnosis to adjuvant treatment, the adherence to CPGs for patients with localized STS was 36% overall, corresponding to 56%, 85%, 96% and 84% for initial surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy and follow-up, respectively. Adherence to CPGs for surgery was the strongest independent prognostic factor of PFS, along with age, gender, grade, and tumor size. For OS, multivariate analysis adherence to CPGs for surgery was a strong independent prognostic factor, with an important interaction with a management in the regional expert centers.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates impact of CPGs and treatment within an expert center on survival for STS patients in a whole population-based cohort.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLeiomyosarcomaLiposarcomaMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProspective StudiesSarcomaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28158190
PMCPMC5291382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.