ArticleApplied optics2017
Experimental evaluation of the resolution and quantitative accuracy of temperature-modulated fluorescence tomography.
Article in Applied optics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-stage diffuse fluorescence tomography for monitoring of drug distribution in photodynamic therapy of tumors.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Fast ICCD-based temperature modulated fluorescence tomography.Applied optics · 2023Article
- Development of a preclinical CCD-based temperature modulated fluorescence tomography platform.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Development of a theranostic preclinical fluorescence molecular tomography/cone beam CT-guided irradiator platform.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Improving sensitivity and imaging depth of ultrasound-switchable fluorescence via an EMCCD-gain-controlled system and a liposome-based contrast agent.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- A thermo-sensitive fluorescent agent based method for excitation light leakage rejection for fluorescence molecular tomography.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Newly-Engineered Materials for Bio-Imaging Technology: A Focus on the Hybrid System of Ultrasound and Fluorescence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Feasibility study of high spatial resolution multimodality fluorescence tomography in ex vivo biological tissue.Applied optics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previously, we reported on the spatial resolution and quantitative accuracy of temperature-modulated fluorescence tomography (TM-FT) using simulation studies. TM-FT is a novel fully integrated multimodality imaging technique that combines fluorescence diffuse optical tomography (FT) with focused ultrasound. Utilizing unique thermo-reversible fluorescent nanocapsules (ThermoDots), TM-FT provides high-resolution cross-sectional fluorescence images in thick tissue (up to 6 cm). Focused ultrasound and temperature-sensitive ThermoDots are combined to provide accurate localization of these fluorescent probes and functional a priori information to constrain the conventional FT reconstruction algorithm. Our previous simulation studies evaluated the performance of TM-FT using synthetic phantoms with multiple fluorescence targets of various sizes located at different depths. In this follow-up work, we perform experimental studies to evaluate the performance of this hybrid imaging system, in particular, the effect of size, depth, and concentration of the fluorescence target. While FT alone is unable to accurately locate and resolve the fluorophore target in many cases, TM-FT is able to resolve the size and concentration of the ThermoDots within a thick turbid medium with high accuracy for all cases. The maximum error in the recovered ThermoDots concentration and target sizes with TM-FT are 12% and 25%, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.