Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28157671›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Can wheat germ have a beneficial effect on human health? A study protocol for a randomised crossover controlled trial to evaluate its health effects.

André Moreira-Rosário, Helder Pinheiro, Conceição Calhau, Luís Filipe Azevedo

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02405507 phase2completednot on this map

The Effect of Wheat Germ on Gastrointestinal Discomfort, Blood Cholesterol and Postprandial Glycaemic Response in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade do PortoRan2015 to 2017Enrolled55ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmswheat bread with wheat germ, wheat bread without wheat germ
NCT05281146 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Production of Fortified Biscuit With Chickpea and Crushed Peanut and Evaluating Its Effectiveness in Terms of Its Acceptability and Cognitive Performance: a Pilot Study Among Egyptian Primary School-aged Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Research Centre, EgyptRan2018 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsCognitive PerformanceArmsChickpeas and crushed peanuts fortified biscuit, Cognitive stimulation for the mothers, Cognitive stimulation for students
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

André Moreira-RosárioCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Helder PinheiroServiço de Doenças Infecciosas, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Hospital de Curry Cabral, Lisbon, Portugal.
Conceição CalhauCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Luís Filipe AzevedoCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Centre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTHospital Curry Cabral · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide and diet is an important contributor to CVD risk. Thus, several food derivatives are being investigated for their beneficial impact on reducing cardiometabolic risk factors, either in risk groups or in healthy population as a preventive measure. Wheat germ is a food by-product with high nutritional value, especially as a concentrated source of dietary fibre and essential fatty acids, but its incorporation into the diet has been rare up to now. Previous studies do not clarify the hypothesised potential causal relationship between the consumption of wheat germ and benefits for human health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are conducting a randomised, double-blinded, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to assess the physiological effects of daily consumption of wheat germ-enriched bread (containing 6 g of wheat germ) compared with non-enriched bread, over a 4-week period with a 15-week follow-up, in a healthy human population. A total of 55 participants (healthy volunteers, aged 18-60) have been recruited from the Porto metropolitan area in northern Portugal. Our aim is to evaluate the health effects of wheat germ on blood cholesterol and triglycerides, postprandial glycaemic response, gastrointestinal function and discomfort, and changes in intestinal microbiota and insulin resistance as secondary outcomes. The study follows the best practices for evaluating health claims in food according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) scientific opinion, namely random allocation, double blinding, reporting methods to measure and maximise compliance, and validated outcomes with beneficial physiological effects as recommended by EFSA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Health Ethics Committee of São João Hospital Centre (156-15) and the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto (PCEDCSS-FMUP07/2015). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02405507; pre-results.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedTriticumAdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseBreadCholesterolCross-Over StudiesDiet, HealthyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHealthy VolunteersHumansInsulin ResistanceMaleBlood GlucoseCholesterolTriglyceridescardiovascular riskgastrointestinal discomforthealth claimsrandomized controlled trialwheat germ

Identifiers

PMID28157671
PMCPMC5129044
OpenAlexW2555896594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.