Observational studyHealth communication2018
Informing Women and Their Physicians about Recommendations for Adjunct Breast MRI Screening: A Cohort Study.
Observational study in Health communication, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The FYI on MRI: Protocol for a randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of a multilevel decision support intervention to increase informed decision-making about screening breast MRI among high-risk black and Latina women.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to breast cancer screening among high-risk women: a qualitative study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and willingness toward breast magnetic resonance imaging screening among women at high risk of breast cancer in Beijing, China.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Factors influencing U.S. women's interest and preferences for breast cancer risk communication: a cross-sectional study from a large tertiary care breast imaging center.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Factors associated with breast MRI use among women with a family history of breast cancer.The breast journal · 2018Article
- Patterns of Screening Mammography and Breast MRI During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective, Chart-Review Study.Journal of breast imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is unclear how best to communicate recommendations for breast cancer screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography for women at high risk. This study compares the rates of breast MRI screening for two different methods of communication. The retrospective IRB-approved cohort study was conducted at Invision Sally Jobe Breast Centers (ISJBC). ISJBC provided Gail model risk assessment to all women presenting for screening mammography. Women with scores ≥ 19.6% were considered to be high risk. Over 2 years, ISJBC used two different methods to inform women at elevated lifetime risk and their physicians about recommendations for adjunct MRI screening (N = 561, mean age = 52 years, s.d. = 8.7). During Window A, information was sent to referring physicians as a part of the dictated imaging report, while later, in Window B, the information was sent to referring physicians as well as to the women themselves in a letter. Analyses were stratified by mammography screening frequency. One-time screeners presented in only Window A or Window B. Repeat screeners came both in Window A and in Window B. Breast MRI screening rates were significantly higher in Window B than in Window A (one-time screeners, N = 459, 9.8% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.047; repeat screeners, N = 102, 0% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.016). Although an observational study cannot assess causality, direct communication of risk-based recommendations for adjunct breast MRI screening to women and to their referring physicians was associated with an increased rate of screening breast MRI completion at the same clinic at which the women underwent mammography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.