Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28157153›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Enhancing the Biological Relevance of Machine Learning Classifiers for Reverse Vaccinology.

Ashley I Heinson, Yawwani Gunawardana, Bastiaan Moesker, Carmen C Denman Hume, Elena Vataga, Yper Hall, Elena Stylianou, Helen McShane, Ann Williams, Mahesan Niranjan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Vaxi-DL: An Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Platform for Vaccine Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Vaccine Design by Reverse Vaccinology and Machine Learning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic.Information systems frontiers : a journal of research and innovation · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ashley I HeinsonFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. a.heinson@soton.ac.uk.
Yawwani GunawardanaFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. y.p.gunawardana@soton.ac.uk.
Bastiaan MoeskerFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. bastiaanmoesker@gmail.com.
Carmen C Denman HumeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Department of Pathogen Molecular BiologyLondon WC1E 7HT, UK. carmen.denman@gmail.com.
Elena VatagaSolutions, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. e.vataga@soton.ac.uk.
Yper HallPublic Health England, National Infection Service, Porton Down Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK. yper.hall@phe.gov.uk.
Elena StylianouThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK. elena.stylianou@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Helen McShaneThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK. helen.mcshane@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Ann WilliamsPublic Health England, National Infection Service, Porton Down Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK. ann.rawkins@phe.gov.uk.
Mahesan NiranjanDepartment of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. mn@ecs.soton.ac.uk.
Christopher H WoelkFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. c.h.woelk@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse vaccinology (RV) is a bioinformatics approach that can predict antigens with protective potential from the protein coding genomes of bacterial pathogens for subunit vaccine design. RV has become firmly established following the development of the BEXSERO® vaccine against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. RV studies have begun to incorporate machine learning (ML) techniques to distinguish bacterial protective antigens (BPAs) from non-BPAs. This research contributes significantly to the RV field by using permutation analysis to demonstrate that a signal for protective antigens can be curated from published data. Furthermore, the effects of the following on an ML approach to RV were also assessed: nested cross-validation, balancing selection of non-BPAs for subcellular localization, increasing the training data, and incorporating greater numbers of protein annotation tools for feature generation. These enhancements yielded a support vector machine (SVM) classifier that could discriminate BPAs (n = 200) from non-BPAs (n = 200) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.787. In addition, hierarchical clustering of BPAs revealed that intracellular BPAs clustered separately from extracellular BPAs. However, no immediate benefit was derived when training SVM classifiers on data sets exclusively containing intra- or extracellular BPAs. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that ML classifiers have great utility in RV approaches and will lead to new subunit vaccines in the future.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAntigens, BacterialArea Under CurveBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesComputational BiologyEpitope MappingEpitopesHumansMutagenesisROC CurveSupport Vector MachineVaccines, SubunitAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesEpitopesVaccines, Subunitbacterial pathogenbacterial protective antigenmachine learningreverse vaccinologysupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID28157153
PMCPMC5343848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.