Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28157140›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2017

A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial Examining the Impact of an Emergency Department Mechanical Ventilator Protocol on Clinical Outcomes and Lung-Protective Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Brian M Fuller, Ian T Ferguson, Nicholas M Mohr, Anne M Drewry, Christopher Palmer, Brian T Wessman, Enyo Ablordeppey, Jacob Keeperman, Robert J Stephens, Cristopher C Briscoe and 3 more

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Management of Mechanical Ventilation in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.Turkish journal of emergency medicine · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brian M Fuller1Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.2School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.3Division of Critical Care, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.4Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.5Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.6School of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO.7Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Ian T Ferguson
Nicholas M Mohr
Anne M Drewry
Christopher Palmer
Brian T Wessman
Enyo Ablordeppey
Jacob Keeperman
Robert J Stephens
Cristopher C Briscoe
Angelina A Kolomiets
Richard S Hotchkiss
Marin H Kollef

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
SHORT-TERM TRAINING STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SCHOT35HL007815 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHUNG, KOONG-NAH · 1995 to 2020
$2.8M
PREVENTION OF APOPTOTIC CELL DEATH IN SEPSIS BY BCL-2R01GM044118 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOTCHKISS, RICHARD SAMUEL · 1992 to 2017
$2.7M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesTL1TR000449 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000449NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL115663NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007815NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the impact of an emergency department mechanical ventilation protocol on clinical outcomes and adherence to lung-protective ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

designQuasi-experimental, before-after trial.

settingEmergency department and ICUs of an academic center. PATIENTS: Mechanically ventilated emergency department patients experiencing acute respiratory distress syndrome while in the emergency department or after admission to the ICU.

interventionsAn emergency department ventilator protocol which targeted variables in need of quality improvement, as identified by prior work: 1) lung-protective tidal volume, 2) appropriate setting of positive end-expiratory pressure, 3) oxygen weaning, and 4) head-of-bed elevation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsA total of 229 patients (186 preintervention group, 43 intervention group) were studied. In the emergency department, the intervention was associated with significant changes (p < 0.01 for all) in tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen administration, and head-of-bed elevation. There was a reduction in emergency department tidal volume from 8.1 mL/kg predicted body weight (7.0-9.1) to 6.4 mL/kg predicted body weight (6.1-6.7) and an increase in lung-protective ventilation from 11.1% to 61.5%, p value of less than 0.01. The intervention was associated with a reduction in mortality from 54.8% to 39.5% (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.83; p = 0.02) and a 3.9 day increase in ventilator-free days, p value equals to 0.01.

conclusionsThis before-after study of mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome demonstrates that implementing a mechanical ventilator protocol in the emergency department is feasible and associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedClinical ProtocolsControlled Before-After StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareOxygen Inhalation TherapyPatient PositioningPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID28157140
PMCPMC5350028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.