Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28155708›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

PARRoT- a homology-based strategy to quantify and compare RNA-sequencing from non-model organisms.

Ruei-Chi Gan, Ting-Wen Chen, Timothy H Wu, Po-Jung Huang, Chi-Ching Lee, Yuan-Ming Yeh, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Hsien-Da Huang, Petrus Tang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruei-Chi GanDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, 300, Taiwan.
Ting-Wen ChenBioinformatics Center, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Timothy H WuInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Po-Jung HuangBioinformatics Center, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chi-Ching LeeBioinformatics Center, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yuan-Ming YehBioinformatics Center, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hsun ChiuMolecular Infectious Diseases Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hsien-Da HuangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, 300, Taiwan. bryan@mail.nctu.edu.tw.
Petrus TangBioinformatics Center, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. petang@mail.cgu.edu.tw.
Chang Gung University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation sequencing promises the de novo genomic and transcriptomic analysis of samples of interests. However, there are only a few organisms having reference genomic sequences and even fewer having well-defined or curated annotations. For transcriptome studies focusing on organisms lacking proper reference genomes, the common strategy is de novo assembly followed by functional annotation. However, things become even more complicated when multiple transcriptomes are compared.

resultsHere, we propose a new analysis strategy and quantification methods for quantifying expression level which not only generate a virtual reference from sequencing data, but also provide comparisons between transcriptomes. First, all reads from the transcriptome datasets are pooled together for de novo assembly. The assembled contigs are searched against NCBI NR databases to find potential homolog sequences. Based on the searched result, a set of virtual transcripts are generated and served as a reference transcriptome. By using the same reference, normalized quantification values including RC (read counts), eRPKM (estimated RPKM) and eTPM (estimated TPM) can be obtained that are comparable across transcriptome datasets. In order to demonstrate the feasibility of our strategy, we implement it in the web service PARRoT. PARRoT stands for Pipeline for Analyzing RNA Reads of Transcriptomes. It analyzes gene expression profiles for two transcriptome sequencing datasets. For better understanding of the biological meaning from the comparison among transcriptomes, PARRoT further provides linkage between these virtual transcripts and their potential function through showing best hits in SwissProt, NR database, assigning GO terms. Our demo datasets showed that PARRoT can analyze two paired-end transcriptomic datasets of approximately 100 million reads within just three hours.

conclusionsIn this study, we proposed and implemented a strategy to analyze transcriptomes from non-reference organisms which offers the opportunity to quantify and compare transcriptome profiles through a homolog based virtual transcriptome reference. By using the homolog based reference, our strategy effectively avoids the problems that may cause from inconsistencies among transcriptomes. This strategy will shed lights on the field of comparative genomics for non-model organism. We have implemented PARRoT as a web service which is freely available at http://parrot.cgu.edu.tw .

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSoftwareTranscriptomeAnimalsCnidariaGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInternetMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, RNAComparative transcriptomeDe novo transcriptome assemblyNon-model transcriptomeTranscriptome quantificationWeb service

Identifiers

PMID28155708
PMCPMC5260104
OpenAlexW2564683500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.