Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28155656›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

2016 update on APBioNet's annual international conference on bioinformatics (InCoB).

Christian Schönbach, Chandra Verma, Lawrence Jin Kiat Wee, Peter John Bond, Shoba Ranganathan

Abstract readConference ProceedingsEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian SchönbachInternational Research Center for Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan. chris@kumamoto-u.ac.jp.
Chandra VermaBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore, 138671, Singapore.
Lawrence Jin Kiat WeeInstitute for Infocomm Research, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 138632, Singapore.
Peter John BondBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore, 138671, Singapore.
Shoba RanganathanDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. shoba.ranganathan@mq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

InCoB became since its inception in 2002 one of the largest annual bioinformatics conferences in the Asia-Pacific region with attendance ranging between 150 and 250 delegates depending on the venue location. InCoB 2016 in Singapore was attended by almost 220 delegates. This year, sessions on structural bioinformatics, sequence and sequencing, and next-generation sequencing fielded the highest number of oral presentation. Forty-four out 96 oral presentations were associated with an accepted manuscript in supplemental issues of BMC Bioinformatics, BMC Genomics, BMC Medical Genomics or BMC Systems Biology. Articles with a genomics focus are reviewed in this editorial. Next year's InCoB will be held in Shenzen, China from September 20 to 22, 2017.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyAnimalsGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansAPBioNetAsia-Pacific bioinformatics networkInCoBInternational conference on bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID28155656
PMCPMC5259860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.