ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
A network-based pathway-expanding approach for pathway analysis.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable management of whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) in vegetables using entomopathogenic fungi, Isaria farinosa: Characterization, efficacy, insecticide compatibility with molecular docking insights.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of reference-free transcriptomic deconvolution highlights the importance of biological validation in astrocytes across Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Sensitivity analysis on protein-protein interaction networks through deep graph networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Dynamically characterizing individual clinical change by the steady state of disease-associated pathway.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A network-based pathway-extending approach using DNA methylation and gene expression data to identify altered pathways.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- FoPA: identifying perturbed signaling pathways in clinical conditions using formal methods.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Finding disagreement pathway signatures and constructing an ensemble model for cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPathway analysis combining multiple types of high-throughput data, such as genomics and proteomics, has become the first choice to gain insights into the pathogenesis of complex diseases. Currently, several pathway analysis methods have been developed to study complex diseases. However, these methods did not take into account the interaction between internal and external genes of the pathway and between pathways. Hence, these approaches still face some challenges. Here, we propose a network-based pathway-expanding approach that takes the topological structures of biological networks into account.
resultsFirst, two weighted gene-gene interaction networks (tumor and normal) are constructed integrating protein-protein interaction(PPI) information, gene expression data and pathway databases. Then, they are used to identify significant pathways through testing the difference of topological structures of expanded pathways in the two weighted networks. The proposed method is employed to analyze two breast cancer data. As a result, the top 15 pathways identified using the proposed method are supported by biological knowledge from the published literatures and other methods. In addition, the proposed method is also compared with other methods, such as GSEA and SPIA, and estimated using the classification performance of the top 15 expanded pathways.
conclusionsA novel network-based pathway-expanding approach is proposed to avoid the limitations of existing pathway analysis approaches. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method can accurately and reliably identify significant pathways which are related to the corresponding disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.