Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28155633›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Multi-CAR: a tool of contig scaffolding using multiple references.

Kun-Tze Chen, Cheih-Jung Chen, Hsin-Ting Shen, Chia-Liang Liu, Shang-Hao Huang, Chin Lung Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic blueprint of a relapsing fever pathogen in 15th century Scandinavia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kun-Tze ChenDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan.
Cheih-Jung ChenDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan.
Hsin-Ting ShenDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan.
Chia-Liang LiuDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan.
Shang-Hao HuangDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan.
Chin Lung LuDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan. cllu@cs.nthu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA draft genome assembled by current next-generation sequencing techniques from short reads is just a collection of contigs, whose relative positions and orientations along the genome being sequenced are unknown. To further obtain its complete sequence, a contig scaffolding process is usually applied to order and orient the contigs in the draft genome. Although several single reference-based scaffolding tools have been proposed, they may produce erroneous scaffolds if there are rearrangements between the target and reference genomes or their phylogenetic relationship is distant. This may suggest that a single reference genome may not be sufficient to produce correct scaffolds of a draft genome.

resultsIn this study, we design a simple heuristic method to further revise our single reference-based scaffolding tool CAR into a new one called Multi-CAR such that it can utilize multiple complete genomes of related organisms as references to more accurately order and orient the contigs of a draft genome. In practical usage, our Multi-CAR does not require prior knowledge concerning phylogenetic relationships among the draft and reference genomes and libraries of paired-end reads. To validate Multi-CAR, we have tested it on a real dataset composed of several prokaryotic genomes and also compared its accuracy performance with other multiple reference-based scaffolding tools Ragout and MeDuSa. Our experimental results have finally shown that Multi-CAR indeed outperforms Ragout and MeDuSa in terms of sensitivity, precision, genome coverage, scaffold number and scaffold N50 size.

conclusionsMulti-CAR serves as an efficient tool that can more accurately order and orient the contigs of a draft genome based on multiple reference genomes. The web server of Multi-CAR is freely available at http://genome.cs.nthu.edu.tw/Multi-CAR/ .

Indexed as

SoftwareBacteriaContig MappingGenome, BacterialGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNABioinformaticsContigsMultiple referencesNext-generation sequencingScaffolding

Identifiers

PMID28155633
PMCPMC5260120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.