Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28155335›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery2017

Design of amphotericin B oral formulation for antifungal therapy.

Min Liu, Meiwan Chen, Zhiwen Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent progress in carbon dots for anti-pathogen applications in oral cavity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Synthesis and characterization of NHThe Journal of antibiotics · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Min Liub Urology Department , First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Gannan Medical University , Ganzhou , China , and.
Meiwan Chenc State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine , Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau , Macau , China.
Zhiwen Yanga Department of Pharmacy , Songjiang Hospital Affiliated Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Macau · MO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphotericin B (AmB) remains the "gold standard" for systemic antifungal therapy, even though new drugs are emerging as the attractive antifungal agents. Since AmB has negligible oral absorption as a consequence of its unfavorable physicochemical characterizations, its use is restricted to parenteral administration which is accompanied by severe side effects. As greater understanding of the gastrointestinal tract has developed, the advanced drug delivery systems are emerging with the potential to overcome the barriers of AmB oral delivery. Much research has demonstrated that oral AmB formulations such as lipid formulations may have beneficial therapeutic efficacy with reduced adverse effects and suitable for clinical application. Here we reviewed the different formulation strategies to enhance oral drug efficacy, and discussed the current trends and future perspectives for AmB oral administration in the treatment of antifungal infections.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAmphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsBiological AvailabilityDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsGastrointestinal AbsorptionHumansLiposomesSolubilityAmphotericin BAntifungal Agentsliposomal amphotericin BLiposomesAmphotericin Bformulation designoral administration

Identifiers

PMID28155335
PMCPMC8241147
OpenAlexW2585333725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.