ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2017
Electrophoretic Mobilities of the Charge Variants of DNA and Other Polyelectrolytes: Similarities, Differences, and Comparison with Theory.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Internal and Bulge Loops on the Thermal Stability of Small DNA Duplexes.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- In situ Surface Charge Density Visualization of Self-assembled DNA Nanostructures after Ion Exchange.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2020Article
- Electrophoretic Mobility of DNA in Solutions of High Ionic Strength.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Free solution electrophoretic mobilities of polyelectrolytes with different charge densities have been analyzed using data taken from the literature. The polyions include single- and double-stranded DNA oligomers, small aromatic molecules, peptides, proteins, and synthetic copolymers. Mobility variations due to differences in the background electrolytes were minimized by calculating mobility ratios, dividing the mobility of each charge variant in each data set by the mobility of the most highly charged polyion in that data set. In all cases, the mobility ratios increase linearly with the logarithm of the fractional charge, not the first power of the charge as usually assumed. In addition, the mobility ratios observed for all polyelectrolytes, except for the synthetic copolymers, exhibit a common dependence on the logarithm of fractional charge. The unique results observed for the synthetic copolymers may be due to the flexibility of their hydrocarbon backbones, in contrast to the relatively rigid hydrophilic backbones of the other polyelectrolytes. The mobilities observed for the DNA charge variants are well predicted by the Manning electrophoresis equation, whereas the mobilities predicted by zeta potential theories are higher. However, mobility ratios calculated from both theories agree with the observed results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.