ReviewMolecular imaging and biology2017
Fluorescence Imaging for Cancer Screening and Surveillance.
Review in Molecular imaging and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emission-tunable aromatic thiadiazole derivatives based on triphenylimidazole with aggregation-induced emission activity and their application in osteosarcoma imaging.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Article
- Is seeing believing?-signal differentiation in a preclinical transbronchial imaging study implementing a composite optical fiber bronchoscope to detect a folate receptor-targeted near-infrared fluorophore.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence with smartphone-based imaging for cancer detection in vivo.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Review
- Affordable Small Molecules as Promising Fluorescent Labels for Biomolecules.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Revisiting the standards of cancer detection and therapy alongside their comparison to modern methods.World journal of methodology · 2024Review
- Small molecule targeted therapies for endometrial cancer: progress, challenges, and opportunities.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Fluorescent monitoring osteogenic differentiation of osteosarcoma cells with an aggregation-induced emission probe.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Review
- Progress of fluorescence imaging in lymph node dissection surgery for prostate and bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- UrinaryCancers · 2023Article
- Intraoperative Tumor Detection Using Pafolacianine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Intraoperative fluorescence molecular imaging accelerates the coming of precision surgery in China.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Review
- Autofluorescence imaging within the liver: a promising tool for the detection and characterization of primary liver tumors.European radiology · 2022Article
- A Structure-Activity Relationship Study of Bimodal BODIPY-Labeled PSMA-Targeting Bioconjugates.ChemMedChem · 2021Article
- Article
- Mesoscopic 3D imaging of pancreatic cancer and Langerhans islets based on tissue autofluorescence.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Antibody-Targeted Imaging of Gastric Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Rational design of small molecule fluorescent probes for biological applications.Organic & biomolecular chemistry · 2020Review
- Evaluation of Aminolevulinic Acid-Derived Tumor Fluorescence Yields Disparate Results in Murine and Spontaneous Large Animal Models of Lung Cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Environmentally compatible bioconjugated gold nanoparticles as efficient contrast agents for inflammation-induced cancer imaging.Nanoscale research letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of fluorescence imaging (FI) for cancer cell detection in the field of oncology is promising for both cancer screening and surgical resection. Particularly, FI in cancer screening and surveillance is actively being evaluated in many new clinical trials with over 30 listed on Clinical Trials.gov . While surgical resection forms the foundation of many oncologic treatments, early detection is the cornerstone for improving outcomes and reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The applications of FI are twofold as it can be applied to high-risk patients in addition to those undergoing active surveillance. This technology has the promise of highlighting lesions not readily detected by conventional imaging or physical examination, allowing disease detection at an earlier stage of development. Additionally, there is a persistent need for innovative, cost-effective imaging modalities to ameliorate healthcare disparities and the global burden of cancer worldwide. In this review, we outline the current utility of FI for screening and detection in a range of cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.