Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28155061›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2017

Do ethnicity and gender influence posterior tibial slope?

Salvatore Bisicchia, Gavinca M Scordo, Johan Prins, Cosimo Tudisco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Do age, gender, and region affect tibial slope? A multi-center study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A review of role of osteotomy in knee ligament injuries.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Salvatore BisicchiaOspedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4019-4810
Gavinca M ScordoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sport Traumatology Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Johan PrinsLife Little Company of Mary Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
Cosimo TudiscoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sport Traumatology Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy. cosimo.tudisco@uniroma2.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthnicity and gender can affect posterior tibial slope; however, studies on this topic have limitations and are in disagreement. The aim of the present study was to evaluate posterior tibial slope in a large group of consecutive patients, determining whether ethnicity and gender can influence its value. Secondly, to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability of the two radiographic methods adopted. MATERIALS AND

methodsPosterior tibial slope was calculated (rater 1) in lateral view X-rays of the knee according to the posterior tibial cortex (PTC) and tibial proximal anatomical axis (TPAA) methods. Data were matched with ethnicity and gender. For determination of intra- and inter-rater reliability, 50 random X-rays were selected, and blindly measured by two other raters (2 and 3).

resultsA total of 581 radiographs were included (413 white and 168 black knees). Comparing white and black subjects, a statistically significant difference was found for both PTC (4.9 ± 1.2 vs 7.1 ± 2.9, p < 0.0001), and for TPAA (7.7 ± 1.1 vs 10.2 ± 3.0, p < 0.0001). In white subjects, an influence of gender was found only for TPAA (6.4 ± 1.1 in males vs 7.6 ± 1.1 in females, p < 0.0001). In black subjects, an influence of gender was found only for PTC (7.4 ± 3.0 in males vs 6.2 ± 2.9 in females, p = 0.01). Intra-rater reliability was good for both methods for rater 1, and very good for rater 2. Inter-rater reliability among the 3 raters was very good for both methods.

conclusionsDifferences in posterior tibial slope between different ethnic groups exist. Differences observed between genders are conflicting and might be too small to have implications in clinical practice. The TPAA method is recommended for the evaluation of posterior tibial slope because of higher intra- and inter-rater reliability. Level of evidence 3 Case-control study.

Indexed as

AdultBlack PeopleEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSex FactorsTibiaWhite PeopleEthnicityGenderKneeTibial slope

Identifiers

PMID28155061
PMCPMC5685973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.