Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28155043›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2017

Can Appealing to Patient Altruism Reduce Overuse of Health Care Services? An Experimental Survey.

Kevin R Riggs, Peter A Ubel, Brendan Saloner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low-Value Clinical Practices: Knowledge and Beliefs of Spanish Surgeons and Anesthetists.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Appealing to Altruism May Not Work, But Don't Give Up Hope.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. Altruism and Medical Practice.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin R RiggsDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, MT 610, Birmingham, AL, 35294-4410, USA. kriggs@uab.edu.
Peter A UbelDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Brendan SalonerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Duke University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA challenge to reducing overuse of health services is communicating recommendations against unnecessary health services to patients. The predominant approach has been to highlight the limited benefit and potential harm of such services for that patient, but the prudent use of health resources can also benefit others. Whether appealing to patient altruism can reduce overuse is unknown.

objectiveTo determine whether altruistic appeals reduce hypothetical requests for overused services and affect physician ratings.

designExperimental survey using hypothetical vignettes describing three overused health services (antibiotics for acute sinusitis, imaging for acute low back pain, and annual exams for healthy adults).

participantsU.S. adults recruited from Research Now, an online panel of individuals compensated for performing academic and marketing research surveys.

interventionsIn the control version of the vignettes, the physician's rationale for recommending against the service was the minimal benefit and potential for harm. In the altruism version, the rationale additionally included potential benefit to others by forgoing that service. MAIN MEASURES: Differences in requests for overused services and physician ratings between participants randomized to the control and altruism versions of the vignettes. KEY

resultsA total of 1001 participants were included in the final analyses. There were no significant differences in requests for overused services for any of the clinical scenarios (P values ranged from 0.183 to 0.547). Physician ratings were lower in the altruism version for the acute sinusitis (6.68 vs. 7.03, P = 0.012) and back pain scenarios (6.14 vs. 6.83, P < 0.001), and marginally lower for the healthy adult scenario (5.27 vs. 5.57, P = 0.084).

conclusionsIn this experimental survey, altruistic appeals delivered by physicians did not reduce requests for overused services, and resulted in more negative physician ratings. Further studies are warranted to determine whether alternative methods of appealing to patient altruism can reduce overuse.

Indexed as

AltruismPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareYoung Adultaltruismoveruseprimary care

Identifiers

PMID28155043
PMCPMC5481226
OpenAlexW2584714536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.