Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28155039›Full record

ReviewAIDS and behavior2018

A Global Review of HIV Self-testing: Themes and Implications.

Danielle R Stevens, Caroline J Vrana, Raviv E Dlin, Jeffrey E Korte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Acceptability and uptake of HIV self-testing in emergency care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analyses to Assess the Effectiveness of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Self-testing Distribution Strategies.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle R StevensDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 305, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. stevensd@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4321-8355
Caroline J VranaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 305, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Raviv E DlinDepartment of Health Promotion and Physical Education, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Jeffrey E KorteDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 305, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)TL1TR001451 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FEGHALI-BOSTWICK, CAROL A. · 2015 to 2024
$4.6M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001451NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV self-test kits may have the potential to increase testing rates around the globe, and thereby lead to reductions in HIV-related incidence and mortality. However, the effectiveness of these self-test kits and the issues surrounding self-testing have been greatly debated in recent years. We conducted a literature review on the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of HIV self-testing (HST) around the world. Of the 28 articles abstracted, several themes of HST were explored, including behavioral risk compensation, presence of counseling, uses of HST, ability to perform the self-test, sensitivity and specificity, concordance with confirmatory testing, perceptions surrounding HST, instruction and supervision, and cost. Overall, this literature review found that this diverse group of participants generally performed HST correctly with a few exceptions, were accepting of the test if available at a relatively low cost, and preferred the oral-based HST over the blood-based test.

Indexed as

AIDS SerodiagnosisCounselingHIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareReagent Kits, DiagnosticSelf CareSensitivity and SpecificityReagent Kits, DiagnosticAcceptabilityBlood self-testHIV self-testingOral self-testPerceptions

Identifiers

PMID28155039
PMCPMC5910655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.