Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28155020›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Risks factors and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with cancer: a matched case-control study.

Andrew I T Hebbard, Monica A Slavin, Caroline Reed, Jason A Trubiano, Benjamin W Teh, Gabrielle M Haeusler, Karin A Thursky, Leon J Worth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Iron Effects onAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Outcomes ofEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew I T HebbardDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia.
Monica A SlavinDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia.
Caroline ReedMicrobiology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jason A TrubianoDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia.
Benjamin W TehDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia.
Gabrielle M HaeuslerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia.
Karin A ThurskyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia.
Leon J WorthDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia. Leon.Worth@Petermac.org.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUNational Health and Medical Research Council · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of diarrhoea in hospitalised patients. Cancer populations are at high-risk for infection, but comprehensive evaluation in the current era of cancer care has not been performed. The objective of this study was to describe characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of CDI in cancer patients.

methodsFifty consecutive patients with CDI at a large Australian cancer centre (2013-2015) were identified from the hospital pathology database. Each case was matched by ward and hospital admission date to three controls without toxigenic CDI. Treatment and outcomes of infection were evaluated and potential risk factors were analysed using conditional logistic regression.

resultsPatients with CDI had a mean age of 59.7 years and 74% had an underlying solid tumour. Healthcare-associated infection comprised 80% of cases. Recurrence occurred in 10, and 12% of cases were admitted to ICU within 30 days. Severe or severe-complicated infection was observed in 32%. Independent risk factors for infection included chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR) 3.82, 95% CI 1.67-8.75; p = 0.002), gastro-intestinal/abdominal surgery (OR 4.64, 95% CI 1.20-17.91; p = 0.03), proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.05-5.80; p = 0.04), and days of antibiotic therapy (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.02).

conclusionsSevere or complicated infections are frequent in patients with cancer who develop CDI. Receipt of chemotherapy, gastro-intestinal/abdominal surgery, PPI therapy, and antibiotic exposure contribute to infection risk. More effective CDI therapy for cancer patients is required and dedicated antibiotic stewardship programs in high-risk cancer populations are needed to ameliorate infection risk.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCross InfectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAntibiotic stewardshipCancerClostridium difficileEpidemiologyRisksSeverity

Identifiers

PMID28155020
OpenAlexW2584371496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.