ArticleJournal of neurology2017
Convexity subarachnoid haemorrhage has a high risk of intracerebral haemorrhage in suspected cerebral amyloid angiopathy.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of intracranial haemorrhage and ischaemic stroke after convexity subarachnoid haemorrhage in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: international individual patient data pooled analysis.Journal of neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Primary acute convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage in older patients: analysis of baseline, clinical and MRI characteristics including quantitative surface study and topographical probabilistic mapping of convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2023Trial
- Transient focal neurological episodes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Association ofStroke and vascular neurology · 2025Article
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage and finger-like projection predict recurrence in patients with lobar intracerebral hemorrhage.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Amyloid β-related Angiitis Presenting with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Diagnosed by Brain Biopsy: A Case Report.NMC case report journal · 2025Article
- Management of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Cerebral Hemorrhage: Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Future Directions.Circulation research · 2022Review
- CT-Visible Convexity Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Predicts Early Recurrence of Lobar Hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Review
- Current Management and Therapeutic Strategies for Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Early MRI imaging and follow-up study in cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2021Article
- Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage in lobar intracerebral hemorrhage: A prognostic marker.Neurology · 2020Article
- Clinical Features and Experimental Models of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Review
- Clinical features distinguish cerebral amyloid angiopathy-associated convexity subarachnoid haemorrhage from suspected TIA.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Incidence of Convexal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Elderly: The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2019Article
- CNS small vessel disease: A clinical review.Neurology · 2019Review
- The Clinical Dilemma of Anticoagulation Use in Patients with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Atrial Fibrillation.Current cardiology reports · 2018Review
- Acute convexity subarachnoid haemorrhage and cortical superficial siderosis in probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy without lobar haemorrhage.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risk of future symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) remains uncertain in patients with acute convexity subarachnoid haemorrhage (cSAH) associated with suspected cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). We assessed the risk of future sICH in patients presenting to our comprehensive stroke service with acute non-traumatic cSAH due to suspected CAA, between 2011 and 2016. We conducted a systematic search and pooled analysis including our cohort and other published studies including similar cohorts. Our hospital cohort included 20 patients (mean age 69 years; 60% male); 12 (60%) had probable CAA, and 6 (30%) had possible CAA according to the modified Boston criteria; two did not meet CAA criteria because of age <55 years, but were judged likely to be due to CAA. Fourteen patients (70%) had cortical superficial siderosis; 12 (60%) had cerebral microbleeds. Over a mean follow-up period of 19 months, 2 patients (9%) suffered sICH, both with probable CAA (annual sICH risk for probable CAA 8%). In a pooled analysis including our cohort and eight other studies (n = 172), the overall sICH rate per patient-year was 16% (95% CI 11-24%). In those with probable CAA (n = 104), the sICH rate per patient-year was 19% (95% CI 13-27%), compared to 7% (95% CI 3-15%) for those without probable CAA (n = 72). Patients with acute cSAH associated with suspected CAA are at high risk of future sICH (16% per patient-year); probable CAA might carry the highest risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.